It would be better to keep it short as it get used in logs/stacktrace etc. So something like "sling-<pool name>-<counter>" Chetan Mehrotra
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Konrad Windszus <konra...@gmx.de> wrote: > I’m in favour for changing the thread names to the format "Apache Sling - > <pool name> -Thread #<counter>” > Konrad > > >> On 01 Dec 2015, at 10:15, Julian Sedding <jsedd...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi all >> >> Sling Thread Support (aka Commons Threads) uses an underlying >> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor. By default this leads to >> thread names like "pool-1-thread-5". >> >> I was wondering whether we should change the thread names so it is >> clear they are being managed by Sling Thread Support. Also, since >> Pools can be named, it may make sense to include the pool name. I >> imagine something along the lines of "Apache Sling - <pool name> - >> Thread #<counter>", e.g. "Apache Sling - Job Thread Pool - Thread #3". >> >> What do others think? Any objections? If there is agreement, I'll >> create a JIRA issue and go ahead with the implementation. >> >> Regards >> Julian >
