Justin Edelson wrote > > I guess I'm not really understanding the advantage of this flat list (which > wouldn't be a single flat list, but multiple flat lists). What is the the > difference between > > /apps/myco/components/bar > /libs/myco/components/bar > > and > > /foo/apps/myco:components:bar > /foo/libs/myco:components:bar > With /foo you have resource type resources only, nothing else, no clutter. It is true, that having /foo/apps and /foo/libs spoils the whole thing and my initial idea was actually to just have /foo/resourcetypehierarchy - no overlays for the resource type hierarchy. But that would go against or overlay principle.
Maybe my idea is not the best, that's why it is an RT :) But I strongly believe that we should move the hierarchy definition out of the /libs, /apps bags of random stuff. Regards Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler Adobe Research Switzerland cziege...@apache.org
