Daniel Klco wrote > I like the proposal and definitely agree with the idea of deprecating > Resource.getResourceSuperType(), it seems confusing and I've never seen it > actually used. > > Just to confirm, regarding the flat list comment, you just mean that the > list of components can be cached in a list structure, not that the > hierarchy has to be flat, correct?
I was actually suggesting that the hierarchy is flat :) But maybe that's not the best idea. > > Also, would it make sense to designate other structures like this for other > parts of Sling applications? E.g. a dedicated folder for OSGi > Configurations, installed bundles and application content? That would > similarly reduce the amount of resources services would have to traverse > and monitor for updates and would allow for much easier management of > permissions. > Yepp, I think so Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler Adobe Research Switzerland cziege...@apache.org
