Ok. Thanks for your feedback. I'll go ahead with this release then. Regards Julian
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Oliver Lietz <apa...@oliverlietz.de> wrote: > On Tuesday 20 December 2016 12:57:17 Julian Sedding wrote: >> Hi Olli > > Hi Julian, > >> I personally don't like the term "amended", because it is usually used >> in a legal context and its meaning is closer to "improve" rather than >> just "add". Therefore I chose "fragment", which IMHO is more >> descriptive of what it is. > > same here, don't like _amended_ either. > >> If you feel strongly about it, please feel free to change the >> terminology. We can cancel the release in that case. > > No, just felt we should be consistent – but when two think amended doesn't > really fit here let's use the better wording. > > Thanks, > O. > >> Regards >> Julian >> >> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Oliver Lietz <apa...@oliverlietz.de> > wrote: >> > On Thursday 15 December 2016 15:26:21 Julian Sedding wrote: >> >> Hi all >> > >> > hi, >> > >> >> We solved 2 issues in the JCR Base 3.0.0 release: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING/fixforversion/12338709 >> > >> > do we really want to use a different wording for a similar (same?) >> > mechanism – _amended_ vs. _fragment_? >> > >> > Regards, >> > O. >
