+1 (non binding) Regards Julian
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Julian Sedding <jsedd...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ok. Thanks for your feedback. I'll go ahead with this release then. > > Regards > Julian > > On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Oliver Lietz <apa...@oliverlietz.de> wrote: >> On Tuesday 20 December 2016 12:57:17 Julian Sedding wrote: >>> Hi Olli >> >> Hi Julian, >> >>> I personally don't like the term "amended", because it is usually used >>> in a legal context and its meaning is closer to "improve" rather than >>> just "add". Therefore I chose "fragment", which IMHO is more >>> descriptive of what it is. >> >> same here, don't like _amended_ either. >> >>> If you feel strongly about it, please feel free to change the >>> terminology. We can cancel the release in that case. >> >> No, just felt we should be consistent – but when two think amended doesn't >> really fit here let's use the better wording. >> >> Thanks, >> O. >> >>> Regards >>> Julian >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Oliver Lietz <apa...@oliverlietz.de> >> wrote: >>> > On Thursday 15 December 2016 15:26:21 Julian Sedding wrote: >>> >> Hi all >>> > >>> > hi, >>> > >>> >> We solved 2 issues in the JCR Base 3.0.0 release: >>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING/fixforversion/12338709 >>> > >>> > do we really want to use a different wording for a similar (same?) >>> > mechanism – _amended_ vs. _fragment_? >>> > >>> > Regards, >>> > O. >>
