On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <cziege...@apache.org> wrote: > Julian Sedding wrote >>... As a convention for service users, would it make sense to use the >> bundle-symbolic-name as the user-ID (or principal-name)?...
> ...We could use the bundle > symbolic name and the sub service information. That should be enough. We > don't need the class name.... +1 and we might prefix this with bundle_ or b_ to make it clear where these usernames come from? I suppose in the vast majority of cases there's one service user per bundle, so that would remove a lot of boring configurations. -Bertrand
