Il giorno mar 28 mar 2017 alle ore 15:13 Bertrand Delacretaz < bdelacre...@apache.org> ha scritto:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <cziege...@apache.org> > wrote: > > Julian Sedding wrote > >>... As a convention for service users, would it make sense to use the > >> bundle-symbolic-name as the user-ID (or principal-name)?... > > > ...We could use the bundle > > symbolic name and the sub service information. That should be enough. We > > don't need the class name.... > > +1 and we might prefix this with bundle_ or b_ to make it clear where > these usernames come from? > > I suppose in the vast majority of cases there's one service user per > bundle, so that would remove a lot of boring configurations. > +1 Tommaso > > -Bertrand >
