On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Julian Sedding <[email protected]> wrote: > ...lets stick with JSON + comments...
Is that format accepted by JSON tools? Can I for example do cat provisioning-model | jq . ? Otherwise I fear the format combines the worst of both worlds: hard for humans to read and write (JSON) and not directly suitable for machine processing. In which case I suggest rediscussing the comments format/schema to make sure the result is pure JSON - maybe with _comment_ elements that tools can easily ignore. -Bertrand
