On 13 October 2017 at 11:16, Robert Munteanu <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Ian, > > On Fri, 2017-10-13 at 10:51 +0100, Ian Boston wrote: > > Hi, > > I would like to upgrade Sling to depend on Oak 1.7.9 as it was just > > released. The patch be the same as [1] with 1.7.8 replaced by 1.7.9. > > > > Any objections ? > > No objections here. > > Related to the pull request - is it required for bundles consuming > testing.paxexam to bump up their dependency version? If those bundles want to perform integration tests on Oak 1.7.9 then they need to bump the dependency. Some do, some dont, so I bumped all to make certain all would still build on Oak 1.7.9. The first one that needs to do a release, will have to release paxexam at the same time... and fix the references to the 0.0.5-SNAPSHOT version. I assume that was done before since all were on 0.0.4. Best Regards Ian > I think they can > run their tests just fine on the old dependencies and in case of a > release of that module we don't need to wait for a release of > testing.paxexam. > > I'm looking at > > - bundles/commons/contentdetection > - bundles/commons/metrics > - bundles/extensions/org.apache.sling.resource.presence > - bundles/scripting/core > - contrib/extensions/rewriter > - contrib/extensions/sling > - contrib/scripting/freemarker > - contrib/scripting/org.apache.sling.scripting.thymeleaf > > Thanks, > > Robert >
