I think you're looking at the wrong file, somehow.
$ svn up
Updating '.':
At revision 24311.
$ md5sum org.apache.sling.ide.p2update-1.2.0.zip
36f4aadc5be250c4ed6654e9a3d17fb0 org.apache.sling.ide.p2update-1.2.0.zip
$ cat org.apache.sling.ide.p2update-1.2.0.zip.md5
36f4aadc5be250c4ed6654e9a3d17fb0
Also, downloading the file results in an archive with the same checksum as
above.
Robert
On Thu, 2018-01-18 at 22:47 +0100, Konrad Windszus wrote:
> I just redownloaded https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/sling/ide-
> tooling-1.2.0/org.apache.sling.ide.p2update-1.2.0.zip <https://dist.a
> pache.org/repos/dist/dev/sling/ide-tooling-
> 1.2.0/org.apache.sling.ide.p2update-1.2.0.zip>. Still the same issue
> that the contained /plugins/org.apache.sling.ide.eclipse-ui_1.2.0.jar
> is in fact the core module.
> The md5 for the downloaded zip is 2ffdab4588a047d493c78e5bce8e7f55.
> Am I looking at the right thing?
>
> > On 18. Jan 2018, at 22:33, Robert Munteanu <romb...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2018-01-18 at 18:28 +0200, Robert Munteanu wrote:
> > > Hi Konrad,
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2018-01-18 at 16:54 +0100, Konrad Windszus wrote:
> > > > Something must have gone really wrong. After more closely
> > > > inspecting
> > > > the contents of https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/sling/id
> > > > e-to
> > > > ol
> > > > ing-1.2.0/org.apache.sling.ide.p2update-1.2.0.zip <https://dist
> > > > .apa
> > > > ch
> > > > e.org/repos/dist/dev/sling/ide-tooling-
> > > > 1.2.0/org.apache.sling.ide.p2update-1.2.0.zip> it seems that
> > > > the
> > > > contained "org.apache.sling.ide.eclipse-core_1.2.0.jar"
> > > > contains
> > > > the
> > > > plugin.xml from the m2e-ui module. Also the other JARs look
> > > > weird.
> > > > @Robert: Can you check again?
> > >
> > > It seems that the jar contents are correct, but the names are
> > > mixed
> > > up.
> > > I'll look into a fix.
> >
> > I have corrected the signing process and submitted the files with
> > the
> > correct names in the zip file.
> >
> > I am not sure if we should respin the release, given that the
> > artifacts
> > are built from the exact same source code. At any rate, Konrad -
> > can
> > you please retest with the new artifacts?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Robert
>
>
