On Tue, 2019-05-28 at 14:10 +0200, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > > For example the webconsole security provider has such a > > > dependency. > > > In > > > that case it covers the case of a buggy repository > > > implementation...which is actually a workaround. So I think we > > > can > > > simply remove that dependency without a replacement there > > > completely. > > > > Well, if we can remove it and nothing breaks, we're definitely good > > here :-) > > > > The repository implementation might still be buggy and register the > repository service although the repository is still not usable. > That's why we initially added the dependency. Clearly this is a > workaround, the workaround is in place for years now and it seems to > be > time to remove it
I think we should be in a position to fix whatever made the repository buggy, so +1 to removing it. Thanks, Robert
