Hi Robert, thanks for your response. I agree with all points except for > One option is to ask Oak to > make a configuration required for some components [3], but IMO this is > not fixing the root cause. Oak is not to blame for the way we manage > components and configurations. > IMHO every OSGi service should be able to deal with reconfigurations no matter when they happen. Therefore fixing it on the Oak side makes IMHO sense. In addition we can improve in which order we set the configuration in Sling.
Konrad
