Proposed edit: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/109 I'll leave
expanding/updating examples with curl to Eric.

On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 5:06 PM David Smiley <[email protected]> wrote:

> Documentation needs maintenance long term -- it can say things or show
> snippets that aren't true eventually or eventually stop working.  Just keep
> that in mind.
>
> ~ David Smiley
> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 4:19 PM Eric Pugh <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> I’d be interested in picking up the baton on that idea….    I could see
>> adding both a curl example, but also a native Powershell example.    Curl
>> on windows is also an alias to powershell methods, so it doesn’t quite work
>> always.   I could imagine have three tabs to demonstrate this.
>>
>>
>> On Apr 29, 2021, at 3:43 AM, Jan Høydahl <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Yea, let's add some warnings and keep post tool for demo purposes.
>> Perhaps in the tutorial
>> https://solr.apache.org/guide/8_8/solr-tutorial.html we could add cURL
>> examples for indexing the data as well as post.jar (using tabs like we do
>> with v1/v2 api)?
>> We can also do a better job suggesting where to look for proper
>> filesystem / web crawlers for those who need that.
>> And as SimplePostTool is not either a good example of how to integrate
>> with Solr in Java, we could really need a Solr SDK with code examples of
>> integration best practices and "ready-to-use" snippets, using SolrJ.
>>
>> Jan
>>
>> 28. apr. 2021 kl. 22:45 skrev Gus Heck <[email protected]>:
>>
>> I've generally been of the impression/opinion that the Post Tool is
>> really just a convenience for folks testing out solr to see what it can do,
>> and not really meant as a production ingestion solution.
>>
>> A little while back I had a client that had a third party tool that
>> "integrated with solr" by invoking post.jar on documents with a script to
>> loop through all the files in a directory and post them (the third party
>> software's direct example of how to integrate, not the client's idea at
>> all). Needless to say this caused difficulties with the gigabytes of data
>> the third party tool had stored in many directories. Of course I don't
>> know, but I'd guess that someone with little experience was tasked with the
>> integration with solr at the third party software company and they followed
>> some examples... then turned them into an "integration" blissfully unaware
>> of the limitations of what they had done.
>>
>> I just re-read the ref guide page on post tool
>> <https://solr.apache.org/guide/8_8/post-tool.html>, and there's nothing
>> there to indicate to the reader that this might not be a good production
>> level solution. Also I notice a couple of recent Jira issues regarding
>> handling of corner cases of strange (broken) behavior or content in a web
>> site's response, giving the impression that that user (who reported both
>> issues) might be treading a path that will stretch the bounds of what the
>> post tool can/should be relied upon for.
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15381
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15370
>>
>> How do folks feel about adding a warning or info box at the top of post
>> tool docs indicating that it is not meant as a production solution, only as
>> a quick way to test out documents. We might also say something more
>> concrete like "virtually any use for a corpus containing over a few
>> thousand documents is a bad idea"? ... or something like that, suggestions
>> welcome...
>>
>> If folks agree then it seems that these two issues are likely to be
>> WONTFIX.
>>
>> -Gus
>>
>> --
>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
>> http://www.the111shift.com (play)
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________
>> *Eric Pugh **| *Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467
>> | http://www.opensourceconnections.com | My Free/Busy
>> <http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal>
>> Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed
>> <https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw>
>> This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be
>> Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless
>> of whether attachments are marked as such.
>>
>>

-- 
http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
http://www.the111shift.com (play)

Reply via email to