dev  

Messages by Thread

• Sharing Solr site "posts"/news to our LinkedIn Group David Smiley via dev
  • Re: Sharing Solr site "posts"/news to our LinkedIn Group arupchauhan . connect
  • Re: Sharing Solr site "posts"/news to our LinkedIn Group Nazerke S.
• ignored fields throw NPE since Solr 10.1 Enlai Li
  • Re: ignored fields throw NPE since Solr 10.1 David Smiley via dev
  • Re: ignored fields throw NPE since Solr 10.1 Enlai Li
• SIP-22 NamedList Reduction: Sovereign Tech Fund application? Ivan Šarić
• SOLR-12613: Node picker for cross-node screens in Admin UI Eric Pugh via dev
• [DISCUSS] Community Virtual Meetup, November 2026 Jason Gerlowski
• Jenkins CI jobs; main (11x) to switch to Java 25 David Smiley via dev
• Re: [JENKINS] Solr » Solr-Maven-Snapshots-main - Build # 2573 - Still Failing! sanjay dutt via dev
• [DISCUSS] How to make running a Secure Solr more approachable? Eric Pugh via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] How to make running a Secure Solr more approachable? Eric Pugh via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] How to make running a Secure Solr more approachable? Jason Gerlowski
  • Re: [DISCUSS] How to make running a Secure Solr more approachable? Jan Høydahl via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] How to make running a Secure Solr more approachable? David Smiley via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] How to make running a Secure Solr more approachable? Jason Gerlowski
  • Re: [DISCUSS] How to make running a Secure Solr more approachable? Eric Pugh via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] How to make running a Secure Solr more approachable? Jan Høydahl via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] How to make running a Secure Solr more approachable? Eric Pugh via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] How to make running a Secure Solr more approachable? Eric Pugh via dev
• FYI, Develocity MCP David Smiley
  • Re: FYI, Develocity MCP Ivan Šarić
  • Re: FYI, Develocity MCP David Smiley
  • Re: FYI, Develocity MCP Jason Gerlowski
  • Re: FYI, Develocity MCP David Smiley via dev
• [ANNOUNCE] Apache Solr 10.1.0 released Andrzej Białecki
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Solr 10.1.0 released David Smiley via dev
• [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Solr 10.1.0 RC3 Andrzej Białecki
  • Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Solr 10.1.0 RC3 David Smiley
• Limiting LBSolrClient retries (inside CloudSolrClient & HttpShardHandler) Chris Hostetter
  • Re: Limiting LBSolrClient retries (inside CloudSolrClient & HttpShardHandler) Nick Boss
  • Re: Limiting LBSolrClient retries (inside CloudSolrClient & HttpShardHandler) Jason Gerlowski
• [DISCUSS] Soft commits without updateLock (seqno-tagged update log) Neeraj Chandraprakash Shukla via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Soft commits without updateLock (seqno-tagged update log) Mikhail Khludnev
• [DISCUSS] Release solr operator v0.10.0 Jan Høydahl
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Release solr operator v0.10.0 Jason Gerlowski
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Release solr operator v0.10.0 Jan Høydahl via dev
• [DISCUSS] Gradle task to add missing ASF license headers to new code files Jalaz Kumar
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Gradle task to add missing ASF license headers to new code files David Smiley
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Gradle task to add missing ASF license headers to new code files Eric Pugh
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Gradle task to add missing ASF license headers to new code files Jalaz Kumar
• Introduction to SoLux (Solr + Luxir) Ishan Chattopadhyaya
  • Re: Introduction to SoLux (Solr + Luxir) Yonik Seeley
  • Re: Introduction to SoLux (Solr + Luxir) David Smiley
  • Re: Introduction to SoLux (Solr + Luxir) Mark Miller
  • Re: Introduction to SoLux (Solr + Luxir) Mark Miller
  • Re: Introduction to SoLux (Solr + Luxir) Ishan Chattopadhyaya
• Re: [JENKINS] Solr » Solr-Test-9.x - Build # 12167 - Still Unstable! sanjay dutt
• Follow-up work after SOLR-17600 (MapSerializable removal) Ivan Šarić
  • Re: Follow-up work after SOLR-17600 (MapSerializable removal) Houston Putman
  • Re: Follow-up work after SOLR-17600 (MapSerializable removal) David Smiley
  • Re: Follow-up work after SOLR-17600 (MapSerializable removal) Ivan Šarić
  • Re: Follow-up work after SOLR-17600 (MapSerializable removal) Ivan Šarić
  • Re: Follow-up work after SOLR-17600 (MapSerializable removal) David Smiley
  • Re: Follow-up work after SOLR-17600 (MapSerializable removal) Ivan Šarić
  • Re: Follow-up work after SOLR-17600 (MapSerializable removal) David Smiley
  • Re: Follow-up work after SOLR-17600 (MapSerializable removal) Ivan Šarić
  • Re: Follow-up work after SOLR-17600 (MapSerializable removal) David Smiley via dev
• [VOTE] Release Solr 10.1.0 RC3 Andrzej Białecki
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.1.0 RC3 Jalaz Kumar
  • Re:[VOTE] Release Solr 10.1.0 RC3 Andrey Ukhanov (BLOOMBERG/ 919 3RD A) via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.1.0 RC3 Jan Høydahl
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.1.0 RC3 David Smiley
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.1.0 RC3 Anshum Gupta
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.1.0 RC3 Joel Bernstein
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.1.0 RC3 Jan Høydahl
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.1.0 RC3 Joel Bernstein
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.1.0 RC3 Rahul Goswami
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.1.0 RC3 Joel Bernstein
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.1.0 RC3 Houston Putman
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.1.0 RC3 Nick Boss
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.1.0 RC3 Andrzej Białecki
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.1.0 RC3 Luke Kot-Zaniewski (BLOOMBERG/ 919 3RD A) via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.1.0 RC3 David Smiley via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.1.0 RC3 Luke Kot-Zaniewski (BLOOMBERG/ 919 3RD A) via dev
• [DISCUSS] Add automatic branch deletion on PR merge Jalaz Kumar
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Add automatic branch deletion on PR merge Eric Pugh
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Add automatic branch deletion on PR merge Jan Høydahl
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Add automatic branch deletion on PR merge Jalaz Kumar
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Add automatic branch deletion on PR merge Mike Drob
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Add automatic branch deletion on PR merge Houston Putman
• Re: [JENKINS] Solr » Solr-Test-10.x - Build # 2842 - Still Unstable! sanjay dutt
  • Re: [JENKINS] Solr » Solr-Test-10.x - Build # 2842 - Still Unstable! sanjay dutt
  • Re: [JENKINS] Solr » Solr-Test-10.x - Build # 2842 - Still Unstable! David Smiley
• [DISCUSS] major-changes-in adoc David Smiley
  • Re: [DISCUSS] major-changes-in adoc Jan Høydahl
  • Re: [DISCUSS] major-changes-in adoc Eric Pugh via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] major-changes-in adoc Jan Høydahl
  • Re: [DISCUSS] major-changes-in adoc Eric Pugh
  • Re: [DISCUSS] major-changes-in adoc Jan Høydahl
• [DISCUSS] Periodic Vulnerability Scanning by Claude Jalaz Kumar
• [DISCUSS] SOLR-16396 / PR #5168 - why "componentName" stays QueryParam for RequestHandlers Jalaz Kumar
  • Re: [DISCUSS] SOLR-16396 / PR #5168 - why "componentName" stays QueryParam for RequestHandlers Jalaz Kumar
  • Re: [DISCUSS] SOLR-16396 / PR #5168 - why "componentName" stays QueryParam for RequestHandlers Jan Høydahl
  • Re: [DISCUSS] SOLR-16396 / PR #5168 - why "componentName" stays QueryParam for RequestHandlers David Smiley
• CombinedQuerySearchHandler and numFound Justin Michael Coyne via dev
  • Re: CombinedQuerySearchHandler and numFound Puneet Ahuja
  • Re: Re: CombinedQuerySearchHandler and numFound Amrit Sarkar
  • Re: CombinedQuerySearchHandler and numFound Justin Michael Coyne via dev
  • Re: Re: CombinedQuerySearchHandler and numFound Puneet Ahuja
• [DISCUSS] Enabling max_open_pull_requests for all our repos? Jan Høydahl
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Enabling max_open_pull_requests for all our repos? David Smiley
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Enabling max_open_pull_requests for all our repos? Andrzej Bialecki
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Enabling max_open_pull_requests for all our repos? Houston Putman
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Enabling max_open_pull_requests for all our repos? Jan Høydahl
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Enabling max_open_pull_requests for all our repos? Rahul Goswami
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Enabling max_open_pull_requests for all our repos? Jalaz Kumar
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Enabling max_open_pull_requests for all our repos? Jan Høydahl
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Enabling max_open_pull_requests for all our repos? Jan Høydahl
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Enabling max_open_pull_requests for all our repos? Jalaz Kumar
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Enabling max_open_pull_requests for all our repos? Jan Høydahl
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Enabling max_open_pull_requests for all our repos? Nick Boss
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Enabling max_open_pull_requests for all our repos? Jalaz Kumar
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Enabling max_open_pull_requests for all our repos? Eric Pugh
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Enabling max_open_pull_requests for all our repos? Jan Høydahl
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Enabling max_open_pull_requests for all our repos? Eric Pugh
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Enabling max_open_pull_requests for all our repos? Jalaz Kumar
• [DISCUSS] Standalone vs User Managed terminology David Smiley
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Standalone vs User Managed terminology Rahul Goswami
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Standalone vs User Managed terminology Eric Pugh
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Standalone vs User Managed terminology Gus Heck
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Standalone vs User Managed terminology Andrzej Bialecki
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Standalone vs User Managed terminology Jan Høydahl
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Standalone vs User Managed terminology Eric Pugh
• [DISCUSS] Add branch protection Andrzej Białecki
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Add branch protection Rahul Goswami
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Add branch protection David Smiley
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Add branch protection Jalaz Kumar
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Add branch protection Gus Heck
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Add branch protection Houston Putman
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Add branch protection Jan Høydahl
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Add branch protection David Smiley via dev
• SBOM's in our Release artifacts? Eric Pugh
  • Re: SBOM's in our Release artifacts? Eric Pugh
  • Re: SBOM's in our Release artifacts? Jason Gerlowski
  • Re: SBOM's in our Release artifacts? Eric Pugh
  • Re: SBOM's in our Release artifacts? Piotr P. Karwasz
  • Re: SBOM's in our Release artifacts? Eric Pugh
  • Re: SBOM's in our Release artifacts? Piotr P. Karwasz
• [DISCUSS] Apply additive Schema API updates without a core reload Enlai Li
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Apply additive Schema API updates without a core reload Eric Pugh
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Apply additive Schema API updates without a core reload Enlai Li
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Apply additive Schema API updates without a core reload Eric Pugh
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Apply additive Schema API updates without a core reload Enlai Li
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Apply additive Schema API updates without a core reload David Smiley
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Apply additive Schema API updates without a core reload Enlai Li
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Apply additive Schema API updates without a core reload David Smiley
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Apply additive Schema API updates without a core reload Enlai Li
• Solr 10(.1) jetty layer metrics? Chris Hostetter
  • Re: Solr 10(.1) jetty layer metrics? Chris Hostetter
  • Re: Solr 10(.1) jetty layer metrics? Chris Hostetter
• [DISCUSS] Query Insights: opt-in top-N slow queries per node (SOLR-11994) Amrit Sarkar
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Query Insights: opt-in top-N slow queries per node (SOLR-11994) Eric Pugh via dev
  • Re: Re: [DISCUSS] Query Insights: opt-in top-N slow queries per node (SOLR-11994) Amrit Sarkar
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Query Insights: opt-in top-N slow queries per node (SOLR-11994) Amrit Sarkar
  • Re: Re: [DISCUSS] Query Insights: opt-in top-N slow queries per node (SOLR-11994) Amrit Sarkar
  • Re: Re: [DISCUSS] Query Insights: opt-in top-N slow queries per node (SOLR-11994) David Smiley
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Query Insights: opt-in top-N slow queries per node (SOLR-11994) Amrit Sarkar
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Query Insights: opt-in top-N slow queries per node (SOLR-11994) Eric Pugh
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Query Insights: opt-in top-N slow queries per node (SOLR-11994) Amrit Sarkar
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Query Insights: opt-in top-N slow queries per node (SOLR-11994) Eric Pugh
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Query Insights: opt-in top-N slow queries per node (SOLR-11994) Eric Pugh
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Query Insights: opt-in top-N slow queries per node (SOLR-11994) Amrit Sarkar
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Query Insights: opt-in top-N slow queries per node (SOLR-11994) David Smiley via dev
• [VOTE] Release Solr 10.1.0 RC2 Andrzej Białecki
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.1.0 RC2 Jan Høydahl
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.1.0 RC2 Rahul Goswami
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.1.0 RC2 Andrzej Bialecki
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.1.0 RC2 Rahul Goswami
  • moving cuvs out of the (main) solr repo -- was: Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.1.0 RC2 Chris Hostetter
  • Re: moving cuvs out of the (main) solr repo -- was: Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.1.0 RC2 David Smiley
  • Re: moving cuvs out of the (main) solr repo -- was: Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.1.0 RC2 Houston Putman
  • Re: moving cuvs out of the (main) solr repo -- was: Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.1.0 RC2 Rahul Goswami
  • Re: moving cuvs out of the (main) solr repo -- was: Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.1.0 RC2 Chris Hostetter
  • Re: moving cuvs out of the (main) solr repo -- was: Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.1.0 RC2 Andrzej Białecki
  • Re: moving cuvs out of the (main) solr repo -- was: Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.1.0 RC2 Jan Høydahl
  • Re: moving cuvs out of the (main) solr repo -- was: Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.1.0 RC2 Anshum Gupta
  • Re: moving cuvs out of the (main) solr repo -- was: Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.1.0 RC2 Eric Pugh
  • Re: moving cuvs out of the (main) solr repo -- was: Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.1.0 RC2 Rahul Goswami
  • Re: moving cuvs out of the (main) solr repo -- was: Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.1.0 RC2 Rahul Goswami
  • Re: moving cuvs out of the (main) solr repo -- was: Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.1.0 RC2 Andrzej Białecki
  • Re: moving cuvs out of the (main) solr repo -- was: Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.1.0 RC2 Rahul Goswami
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.1.0 RC2 Andrzej Bialecki
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.1.0 RC2 David Smiley
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.1.0 RC2 Rahul Goswami
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.1.0 RC2 David Smiley
  • Cancelling the vote (Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 10.1.0 RC2) Andrzej Białecki
• Managing individual user's Solr permissions in external system and syncing? Eric Pugh
  • Re: Managing individual user's Solr permissions in external system and syncing? Jan Høydahl
  • Re: Managing individual user's Solr permissions in external system and syncing? Dave
• [RESULT][VOTE] Create ASF Solr MCP Tool repo (solr-mcp) Eric Pugh
  • Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Create ASF Solr MCP Tool repo (solr-mcp) Aditya Parikh
• There will be another 9.something, I think David Smiley
• [ANNOUNCEMENT] Breaking Change in Solr 9.11: Local Tika Extraction Backend Removed Jan Høydahl
• [DISCUSS] Community Virtual Meetup, October 2026 Jason Gerlowski
• Assistance getting JIRA account Justin Michael Coyne via dev
• [VOTE] Create ASF Solr MCP Tool repo (solr-mcp) Eric Pugh
  • Re: [VOTE] Create ASF Solr MCP Tool repo (solr-mcp) Aditya Parikh
  • Re: [VOTE] Create ASF Solr MCP Tool repo (solr-mcp) Andrzej Bialecki

• Earlier messages