Could we simulate user managed replication with an embedded zookeeper
on the primary and pull replicas on the followers?

On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 12:56 PM Jason Gerlowski <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hey Marcus,
>
> The places I've worked in the past have all used SolrCloud primarily
> so I can't speak to any specifics, but my impression from reading
> user-list traffic is that a sizable chunk of Solr's user base prefers
> "User-Managed" mode (formerly called "standalone").  Some because they
> don't want to manage a ZooKeeper cluster.  Some because the
> replication model in 'user-managed' fits their needs better.  Some I
> imagine just haven't bothered to update in many years.
>
> I'm absolutely sympathetic to efforts to streamline development and
> reduce collective debt, but it might be tough to displace such a big
> chunk of users.  I'm curious what others think though.  Maybe the
> proportion of 'user-managed' users out there is smaller than I
> imagine.
>
> Jason
>
> On Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 11:59 PM Marcus Eagan <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hello again,
> >
> > Has the time come for us to reduce scope to move faster and with more 
> > focus? Even for those not in the cloud, SolrCloud has been the undisputed 
> > performance and usability champ since version 8.0. In version 9.0, I'd like 
> > to propose that the deciders in the community deprecate standalone mode in 
> > favor of SolrCloud.
> >
> > There are a few drivers:
> >
> > We only need to support changes that impact SolrCloud going forward. I know 
> > that this is hard to stomach. But by the time Solr reaches version 10.0, 
> > everyone should have migrated to SolrCloud as there is little reason to 
> > continue to run standalone.
> > The new features keep coming to SolrCloud, but not to standalone. You can 
> > see in a few ways how I embarrassingly discovered this late one night while 
> > trying out a PR. If not careful, users can accidentally start Solr in 
> > standalone mode. Think of all the features that they will see documented 
> > but not in their environment. What a confusing user experience?
> > Last but certainly not least, the number of contributors to the project, 
> > and the velocity of those contributions has dropped. . It does not have to 
> > be that way, though. Two ways are for the community to observe our push for 
> > modernization and improved user experience. Simply eliminating the need to 
> > include the -c flag in the start command would be a huge win for many 
> > engineers.We should make life easier for our users as much as the 
> > maintainers here. We can strive to make the upgrade process from 9 to 10 
> > very simple.
> >
> > I tried to make one step in this direction last year by re-ordering the 
> > README to show the Solr Cloud command before the standalone command. I 
> > believe that patch died on the vine, but I would be excited to revive it to 
> > document this effort when the time is appropriate.
> >
> > Reason not to do it:
> >
> >  Some large company out there might view this move as introducing risk. I 
> > view the risk here as negligible but I welcome any perspective there.
> > Some things I inevitably don't know.
> >
> > What do you all think?
> >
> > Thank you all for your voluntary contributions,
> > --
> > Marcus Eagan
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to