+1

I was wondering about this, too. It makes mitigation too complex. There is no 
risk in the exporter script. Just mention this as a single sentence.

Possibly also add the sentence u declining the importance and why in my 
previous message on private list.

Am 12. Dezember 2021 22:16:38 UTC schrieb David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org>:
>Just a simple question here -- does the Prometheus Exporter present a risk
>for the Log4j 2 vulnerability?  It was added to the news page but
>instinctively I don't see how an attacker might exploit it.  If it's not
>expected to be a concern, I think we should state so in the news; no reason
>to raise undue alarm bells.  Maybe we should remove it.
>
>~ David Smiley
>Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
>http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley

--
Uwe Schindler
Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen
https://www.thetaphi.de

Reply via email to