There were lots of Blocker issues with affectsVersion as 9.1. I assume the
intention was to have them be available in 9.1? I've changed them to
fixVersion = 9.1 (blocker).

On Fri, Oct 7, 2022 at 5:17 PM Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) <
cpoersc...@bloomberg.net> wrote:

> Thanks! Merging and backporting is now complete.
>
> From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 10/07/22 04:07:31 UTC+1:00To:  Christine
> Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON ) ,  dev@solr.apache.org
> Subject: Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 9.1.0
>
> Sure, please go ahead.
>
> On Fri, 7 Oct, 2022, 12:15 am Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON), <
> cpoersc...@bloomberg.net> wrote:
>
> > I'd like to include https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1051 for
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13219 bug fix please if that
> > is okay?
> >
> > Christine
> >
> > From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 10/04/22 12:33:03 UTC+1:00To:
> > dev@solr.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 9.1.0
> >
> > Sure, please go ahead.
> >
> >
> > I'm concerned about the intermittent test failures. Noble is looking at
> it,
> > will hold off the release for now. Also, I'm out on vacation for next 3
> > days (Dusshera holidays in India). Will resume the release process once
> I'm
> > back.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 4 Oct, 2022, 12:01 am Tomás Fernández Löbbe, <
> > tomasflo...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I'd like to merge the PR for SOLR-16229 (
> > > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1047) to 9.1 branch if that's OK.
> > >
> > > Tomás
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 11:12 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
> > > ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > NOTICE:
> > > >
> > > > Branch branch_9_1 has been cut and versions updated to 9.2 on stable
> > > > branch.
> > > >
> > > > Please note the following:
> > > >
> > > > * No new features may be committed to the branch without discussion
> on
> > > the
> > > > dev-list.
> > > > * Documentation patches, build patches and serious bug fixes may be
> > > >   committed to the branch. However, you should submit all patches you
> > > >   want to commit to Jira first to give others the chance to review
> > > >   and possibly vote against the patch. Keep in mind that it is our
> > > >   main intention to keep the branch as stable as possible.
> > > > * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be
> > committed
> > > >   to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then
> into
> > > >   the current release branch.
> > > > * Normal unstable and stable branch development may continue as
> usual.
> > > > * Only Jira issues with Fix version 9.1 and priority "Blocker" will
> > delay
> > > >   a release candidate build.
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>

Reply via email to