Please proceed, Noble. Thanks. On Thu, 20 Oct, 2022, 12:09 pm Noble Paul, <noble.p...@gmail.com> wrote:
> hi @Ishan Chattopadhyaya <ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> > > Shall we commit this too ? > SOLR-16478 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16478>: removing a > replica should delete the PRS entry from the hostnode and not from overseer > > > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 3:55 PM Kevin Risden <kris...@apache.org> wrote: > >> SOLR-16464 backport done thanks >> Kevin Risden >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 11:55 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Sure Kevin, please proceed. Thanks. >> > >> > On Thu, 20 Oct, 2022, 9:06 am Kevin Risden, <kris...@apache.org> wrote: >> > >> > > Ishan - is RC1 getting built? I still see some PRS changes going into >> > > branch_9_1 >> > > >> > > If its not too late - any issue if I backport >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16464 - mostly to get >> ahead >> > of >> > > the questions that keep rolling in. >> > > >> > > Kevin Risden >> > > >> > > >> > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 8:56 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >> > > ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > >> > > > All the blockers are now resolved and the latest build passes. >> > > > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/Solr-check-9.1/209/ >> > > > I'll proceed with the RC1 building shortly. Thanks to everyone! >> > > > >> > > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 2:56 PM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> >> > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > Created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16463 >> > > > > >> > > > > Will make a PR for 9.0 >> > > > > >> > > > > Jan >> > > > > >> > > > > > 14. okt. 2022 kl. 00:56 skrev David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org >> >: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Looks like we need to downgrade the Docker image to JDK 11 :-(. >> > Or >> > > > one >> > > > > in >> > > > > > between maybe. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > ~ David Smiley >> > > > > > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer >> > > > > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 4:58 PM Jan Høydahl < >> jan....@cominvent.com >> > > >> > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> On the users list we see several solr 9.0.0 users on Docker/k8s >> > > > > reporting >> > > > > >> frequent crashes due to a know JDK17 bug. >> > > > > >> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/wg7qtkddd1t5h08okj7gm9qbrpdf0ox6 >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> Should we perhaps provide an official solr:9.0.0-temurin11 tag >> as >> > a >> > > > > >> workaround for users? >> > > > > >> And also consider releasing 9.1 docker image with temurin11 as >> > > > default, >> > > > > if >> > > > > >> the bug is not fixed by then? >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> Jan >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >>> 12. okt. 2022 kl. 18:48 skrev Kevin Risden < >> kris...@apache.org>: >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >>>> >> > > > > >>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16457 - >> > > solr.data.home >> > > > > set >> > > > > >>>> to empty string in bin/solr >> > > > > >>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16433 - Solr >> SQL >> > > isn't >> > > > > >>>> working w/ security manager enabled >> > > > > >>>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >>> Merged and backported to branch_9_1 >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >>> Kevin Risden >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 12:32 PM Christine Poerschke >> (BLOOMBERG/ >> > > > > LONDON) >> > > > > >> < >> > > > > >>> cpoersc...@bloomberg.net> wrote: >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >>>> Merging and backporting is now complete. Thank you. >> > > > > >>>> >> > > > > >>>> From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 10/12/22 17:01:02 UTC+1:00To: >> > > > > Christine >> > > > > >>>> Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON ) , dev@solr.apache.org >> > > > > >>>> Subject: Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 9.1.0 >> > > > > >>>> >> > > > > >>>> Sure, please go ahead. Thanks! >> > > > > >>>> >> > > > > >>>> On Wed, 12 Oct, 2022, 5:27 pm Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ >> > > > > LONDON), < >> > > > > >>>> cpoersc...@bloomberg.net> wrote: >> > > > > >>>> >> > > > > >>>>> I'd like to also include >> > > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1050 >> > > > > for >> > > > > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16439 bug fix >> > please >> > > if >> > > > > >> that >> > > > > >>>>> is okay? >> > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > >>>>> Christine >> > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > >>>>> From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 10/11/22 20:11:10 UTC+1:00To: >> > > > > >>>>> dev@solr.apache.org >> > > > > >>>>> Subject: Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 9.1.0 >> > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > >>>>> Sure Kevin, please go ahead. Noble and I are debugging a >> > critical >> > > > > test >> > > > > >>>>> failure related to overseer (SOLR-16440) and kind of >> blocked at >> > > the >> > > > > >>>> moment >> > > > > >>>>> for the release. >> > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > >>>>> On Tue, 11 Oct, 2022, 10:51 pm Kevin Risden, < >> > kris...@apache.org >> > > > >> > > > > >> wrote: >> > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > >>>>>> Ishan I'm hoping to get these two jiras in for 9.1, the PRs >> > are >> > > up >> > > > > >>>> there >> > > > > >>>>>> waiting for reviews and they need to run through tests. The >> > two >> > > > are >> > > > > >>>>>> related. >> > > > > >>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16457 - >> > > > solr.data.home >> > > > > >>>> set >> > > > > >>>>> to >> > > > > >>>>>> empty string in bin/solr >> > > > > >>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16433 - Solr >> SQL >> > > > isn't >> > > > > >>>>>> working >> > > > > >>>>>> w/ security manager enabled >> > > > > >>>>>> >> > > > > >>>>>> Kevin Risden >> > > > > >>>>>> >> > > > > >>>>>> >> > > > > >>>>>> On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 1:41 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >> > > > > >>>>>> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > > > >>>>>> >> > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > >>>>>> >> > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > >>>> >> > > > > >>>> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16453?jql=project%20%3D%20SOLR%20AND% >> > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > >>>> >> > > > > >>>> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> 20(fixVersion%20%3D%209.1)%20AND%20priority%20%3D%20Blocker%20AND%20resolution%2 >> > > > > >>>>> 0%3D%20Unresolved >> > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > >>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 11:10 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >> > > > > >>>>>>> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > >>>>>>>> There were lots of Blocker issues with affectsVersion as >> > 9.1. >> > > I >> > > > > >>>>> assume >> > > > > >>>>>>> the >> > > > > >>>>>>>> intention was to have them be available in 9.1? I've >> changed >> > > > them >> > > > > >>>> to >> > > > > >>>>>>>> fixVersion = 9.1 (blocker). >> > > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > > >>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2022 at 5:17 PM Christine Poerschke >> > (BLOOMBERG/ >> > > > > >>>>> LONDON) >> > > > > >>>>>> < >> > > > > >>>>>>>> cpoersc...@bloomberg.net> wrote: >> > > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks! Merging and backporting is now complete. >> > > > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > > > >>>>>>>>> From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 10/07/22 04:07:31 >> > UTC+1:00To: >> > > > > >>>>>> Christine >> > > > > >>>>>>>>> Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON ) , dev@solr.apache.org >> > > > > >>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr >> 9.1.0 >> > > > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > > > >>>>>>>>> Sure, please go ahead. >> > > > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > > > >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 7 Oct, 2022, 12:15 am Christine Poerschke >> > (BLOOMBERG/ >> > > > > >>>>>> LONDON), < >> > > > > >>>>>>>>> cpoersc...@bloomberg.net> wrote: >> > > > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> I'd like to include >> > > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1051 >> > > > > >>>> for >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13219 bug >> fix >> > > > please >> > > > > >>>>> if >> > > > > >>>>>>> that >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> is okay? >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Christine >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 10/04/22 12:33:03 >> > UTC+1:00To: >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> dev@solr.apache.org >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr >> 9.1.0 >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Sure, please go ahead. >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> I'm concerned about the intermittent test failures. >> Noble >> > is >> > > > > >>>>> looking >> > > > > >>>>>>> at >> > > > > >>>>>>>>> it, >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> will hold off the release for now. Also, I'm out on >> > vacation >> > > > for >> > > > > >>>>>> next >> > > > > >>>>>>> 3 >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> days (Dusshera holidays in India). Will resume the >> release >> > > > > >>>> process >> > > > > >>>>>>> once >> > > > > >>>>>>>>> I'm >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> back. >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 4 Oct, 2022, 12:01 am Tomás Fernández Löbbe, < >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> tomasflo...@gmail.com> >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to merge the PR for SOLR-16229 ( >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1047) to 9.1 >> branch >> > if >> > > > > >>>>> that's >> > > > > >>>>>>> OK. >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Tomás >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 11:12 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya >> < >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> NOTICE: >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Branch branch_9_1 has been cut and versions updated >> to >> > 9.2 >> > > > > >>>> on >> > > > > >>>>>>> stable >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> branch. >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Please note the following: >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> * No new features may be committed to the branch >> without >> > > > > >>>>>>> discussion >> > > > > >>>>>>>>> on >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> the >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> dev-list. >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> * Documentation patches, build patches and serious >> bug >> > > fixes >> > > > > >>>>> may >> > > > > >>>>>>> be >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> committed to the branch. However, you should submit >> all >> > > > > >>>>>> patches >> > > > > >>>>>>>>> you >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> want to commit to Jira first to give others the >> chance >> > to >> > > > > >>>>>> review >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> and possibly vote against the patch. Keep in mind >> that >> > it >> > > > > >>>> is >> > > > > >>>>>> our >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> main intention to keep the branch as stable as >> possible. >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> * All patches that are intended for the branch should >> > > first >> > > > > >>>> be >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> committed >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> to the unstable branch, merged into the stable >> branch, >> > and >> > > > > >>>>>> then >> > > > > >>>>>>>>> into >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> the current release branch. >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> * Normal unstable and stable branch development may >> > > continue >> > > > > >>>>> as >> > > > > >>>>>>>>> usual. >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> * Only Jira issues with Fix version 9.1 and priority >> > > > > >>>> "Blocker" >> > > > > >>>>>>> will >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> delay >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> a release candidate build. >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > >>>>>> >> > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > >>>> >> > > > > >>>> >> > > > > >>>> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org >> > > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org >> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > -- > ----------------------------------------------------- > Noble Paul >
