Hi, Can we add https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16527 to 9.1 before RC2? It fixes a NPE which was introduced in 9.1 and thus not yet released. The PR is simple and soon ready to merge.
Jan > 4. nov. 2022 kl. 13:55 skrev Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) > <[email protected]>: > > SOLR-16502 backport is complete, including moving of the solr/CHANGES.txt > entry on branch_9x and main. > > From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> At: 11/03/22 18:00:09 > UTCTo: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 9.1.0 RC1 > > Sure Christine and Gus, please proceed with merging. > > On Thu, 3 Nov, 2022, 8:37 pm Gus Heck, <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >> Also, maybe we can add my ref guide change? >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16495 >> >> On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 9:57 AM Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) < >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >>> If there's a respin I'd love to see >>> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1141 for >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16502 backported. Would that >>> be okay? >>> >>> From: [email protected] At: 11/03/22 04:26:11 UTCTo: >>> [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 9.1.0 RC1 >>> >>> Noble and I traced the slowdown to the SOLR-16414, we shall commit the >> fix >>> shortly. >>> The parallelStream use there had a drastic performance issue, and nodes >>> never shut down gracefully (with 1000 cores/node). >>> I'd like to -1 this and re-spin, if no one has any objections. >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 4:46 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> During a performance test run (which I'll make available publicly >> soon), >>>> we discovered that the RC1's Solr nodes don't stop gracefully during a >>> test >>>> that creates thousands of collections across 8 nodes and restarts them >> (2 >>>> at a time). >>>> This is not a -1 yet, since we're trying to figure out which commit may >>>> have caused this. I'll report back on this as soon as I have more >>>> information on this. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 10:15 PM Jason Gerlowski < >> [email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> SUCCESS! [0:37:11.183352] >>>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> Did a bit of manual backup/restore testing through the operator + the >>>>> smoketester. >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 6:43 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I'll leave this open for another 3 days, due to Halloween/long >> weekend >>>>> in >>>>>> USA. Please let me know if anyone has any objections/concerns. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, 29 Oct, 2022, 3:54 am Noble Paul, <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> SUCCESS! [1:09:31.684716] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 8:07 AM Houston Putman < >> [email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> SUCCESS! [0:32:29.104358] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I also ran the smoke test for the solr operator with this image: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Successfully smoke tested the Solr Operator v0.6.0! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - Houston >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 12:57 PM Joel Bernstein < >>> [email protected] >>>>>> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> SUCCESS! [1:17:27.016191] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I kicked the tires on the assets as well. Created a 2 shard >>>>> collection, >>>>>>>>> loaded data, ran the SQL module, ran streaming expressions. >> Saw >>> no >>>>>>>>> problems. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein >>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 10:14 AM Kevin Risden < >>> [email protected] >>>>>> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> SUCCESS! [0:29:50.184640] >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Kevin Risden >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 9:34 AM Jan Høydahl < >>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> SUCCESS! [0:44:05.588102] >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Also built docker image, confirming it uses >>>>>>>>> eclipse-temurin:17-jre-focal >>>>>>>>>>> and starts with flag >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >> > -XX:CompileCommand=exclude,com.github.benmanes.caffeine.cache.BoundedLocalCache: >>> :put >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Jan >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 27. okt. 2022 kl. 10:25 skrev Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Solr 9.1.0 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The artifacts can be downloaded from: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.1.0-RC1-rev-eadc4178b30af782a >>> 21cb739122a1bafbc6ae99b >>> < >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.1.0-RC1-rev-eadc4178b30af782a > 21cb739122a1bafbc6ae99b >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.1.0-RC1-rev-eadc4178b30af782a >>> 21cb739122a1bafbc6ae99b >>> < >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.1.0-RC1-rev-eadc4178b30af782a > 21cb739122a1bafbc6ae99b >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You can build a release-candidate of the official docker >>>>> image >>>>>>>> using >>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>> following command: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> DIST_BASE=https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr >> && >>> \ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>> RC_FOLDER=solr-9.1.0-RC1-rev-eadc4178b30af782a21cb739122a1bafbc6ae99b >>>>>>>>>>> && \ >>>>>>>>>>>> docker build >>>>>>>> $DIST_BASE/$RC_FOLDER/solr/docker/Dockerfile.official \ >>>>>>>>>>>> --build-arg >>>>>>>>>> SOLR_DOWNLOAD_URL=$DIST_BASE/$RC_FOLDER/solr/solr-9.1.0.tgz >>>>>>>>>>> \ >>>>>>>>>>>> -t solr-rc:9.1.0-1 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until >>>>> 2022-10-30 >>>>>>>>> 09:00 >>>>>>>>>>> UTC. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 approve >>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion >>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Here is my +1 >>>>>>>>>>>> ---- >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> Noble Paul >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> http://www.needhamsoftware.com <http://www.needhamsoftware.com/> (work) >> http://www.the111shift.com <http://www.the111shift.com/> (play)
