Great, thanks Alessandro! Once I get the go-ahead from Ishan that he's done wrapping up the loose ends from the 9.1.0 release, I'll build an RC based on 2c669fe43777342758a0042b821efb6aa3ec15b6.
Michael On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 12:47 PM Alessandro Benedetti <a.benede...@sease.io> wrote: > > From my side I merged everything and I am monitoring Jenkins! > > > On Mon, 9 Jan 2023, 10:08 Alessandro Benedetti, <a.benede...@sease.io> > wrote: > > > Hi Michael, yes! Doing it right now! > > > > Cheers > > -------------------------- > > *Alessandro Benedetti* > > Director @ Sease Ltd. > > *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer* > > *Apache Solr PMC Member* > > > > e-mail: a.benede...@sease.io > > > > > > *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied > > Consulting | Training | Open Source > > > > Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/> > > LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter > > <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github > > <https://github.com/seaseltd> > > > > > > On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 at 17:18, Michael Gibney <mich...@michaelgibney.net> > > wrote: > > > >> Alessandro, are you still looking to include the SOLR-16588 bugfix? > >> Ishan, any updates on the handful of tasks that you had mentioned were > >> still outstanding from the 9.1.0 release? Aside from these two open > >> questions, it looks like branch_9_1 has settled down with all of the > >> changes we had discussed for inclusion in 9.1.1 (unless I'm missing > >> something). > >> Michael > >> > >> On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 4:50 PM Alessandro Benedetti > >> <a.benede...@sease.io> wrote: > >> > > >> > discussing on the PR, once clarified a bit around Lucene94 (and a > >> backport > >> > to Lucene 9.3 ad hoc for 9.1.1) we should be ready to merge and cherry > >> pick! > >> > > >> > -------------------------- > >> > *Alessandro Benedetti* > >> > Director @ Sease Ltd. > >> > *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer* > >> > *Apache Solr PMC Member* > >> > > >> > e-mail: a.benede...@sease.io > >> > > >> > > >> > *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied > >> > Consulting | Training | Open Source > >> > > >> > Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/> > >> > LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter > >> > <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube > >> > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github > >> > <https://github.com/seaseltd> > >> > > >> > > >> > On Wed, 4 Jan 2023 at 23:26, Michael Gibney <mich...@michaelgibney.net> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > This seems fine to me, assuming no objections from others. > >> > > > >> > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 4:30 PM Alessandro Benedetti > >> > > <a.benede...@sease.io> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > What about including this as well in 9.1.1 : > >> > > > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1255 ? > >> > > > It's an annoying neural search bug, and it's pretty much done, just > >> > > waiting > >> > > > for a few checks and then I'll merge it with the changes! > >> > > > -------------------------- > >> > > > *Alessandro Benedetti* > >> > > > Director @ Sease Ltd. > >> > > > *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer* > >> > > > *Apache Solr PMC Member* > >> > > > > >> > > > e-mail: a.benede...@sease.io > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied > >> > > > Consulting | Training | Open Source > >> > > > > >> > > > Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/> > >> > > > LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter > >> > > > <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube > >> > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github > >> > > > <https://github.com/seaseltd> > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 17:18, Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> > >> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > On 1/3/23 08:05, Michael Gibney wrote: > >> > > > > > and possibly upgrade to Lucene 9.4 > >> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16442 > >> > > > > > particularly considering: > >> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11718 > >> > > > > > >> > > > > It seems like a bad idea to upgrade a critical component to a new > >> major > >> > > > > or minor version in a bugfix release, unless that upgrade closes a > >> > > > > security vulnerability and is fairly limited in scope. I don't > >> think > >> > > > > either of those applies. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Solr 9.1.0 includes Lucene 9.3.0. There are no further 9.3.x > >> releases, > >> > > > > so we don't have that as an option. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > The main concerns for all the above are classloading issues. The > >> > > first > >> > > > > > one (SlotAcc) I think should be backported, since we know it has > >> > > > > > manifested in the wild and it's a very self-contained fix. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > My bias would be to NOT upgrade Lucene, for reasons described > >> above. > >> > > > > The change on SOLR-16165 looks OK to me for a point release. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Thanks, > >> > > > > Shawn > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > >> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > >> > > > >> > > > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
