I might be finding something. I just tried upgrading JesterJ to 9.1 from 9.0 and got
org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene90/Lucene90Codec java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene90/Lucene90Codec at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase.<clinit>(LuceneTestCase.java:663) at java.base/java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method) at java.base/java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:398) at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$2.run(RandomizedRunner.java:627) Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene90.Lucene90Codec at java.base/jdk.internal.loader.BuiltinClassLoader.loadClass(BuiltinClassLoader.java:581) at java.base/jdk.internal.loader.ClassLoaders$AppClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoaders.java:178) at java.base/java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:522) ... 4 more It looks like we upgraded lucene to 9.3 and not the lucene-test-framework (still 9.0)... (still looking into this) On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 3:56 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > You're good to go, Michael. Wish you all the best! > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 1:28 AM Michael Gibney > <mich...@michaelgibney.net> wrote: > > > > Great, thanks Alessandro! Once I get the go-ahead from Ishan that he's > > done wrapping up the loose ends from the 9.1.0 release, I'll build an > > RC based on 2c669fe43777342758a0042b821efb6aa3ec15b6. > > > > Michael > > > > On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 12:47 PM Alessandro Benedetti > > <a.benede...@sease.io> wrote: > > > > > > From my side I merged everything and I am monitoring Jenkins! > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 9 Jan 2023, 10:08 Alessandro Benedetti, <a.benede...@sease.io> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Michael, yes! Doing it right now! > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > -------------------------- > > > > *Alessandro Benedetti* > > > > Director @ Sease Ltd. > > > > *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer* > > > > *Apache Solr PMC Member* > > > > > > > > e-mail: a.benede...@sease.io > > > > > > > > > > > > *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied > > > > Consulting | Training | Open Source > > > > > > > > Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/> > > > > LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter > > > > <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube > > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github > > > > <https://github.com/seaseltd> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 at 17:18, Michael Gibney < > mich...@michaelgibney.net> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> Alessandro, are you still looking to include the SOLR-16588 bugfix? > > > >> Ishan, any updates on the handful of tasks that you had mentioned > were > > > >> still outstanding from the 9.1.0 release? Aside from these two open > > > >> questions, it looks like branch_9_1 has settled down with all of the > > > >> changes we had discussed for inclusion in 9.1.1 (unless I'm missing > > > >> something). > > > >> Michael > > > >> > > > >> On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 4:50 PM Alessandro Benedetti > > > >> <a.benede...@sease.io> wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> > discussing on the PR, once clarified a bit around Lucene94 (and a > > > >> backport > > > >> > to Lucene 9.3 ad hoc for 9.1.1) we should be ready to merge and > cherry > > > >> pick! > > > >> > > > > >> > -------------------------- > > > >> > *Alessandro Benedetti* > > > >> > Director @ Sease Ltd. > > > >> > *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer* > > > >> > *Apache Solr PMC Member* > > > >> > > > > >> > e-mail: a.benede...@sease.io > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied > > > >> > Consulting | Training | Open Source > > > >> > > > > >> > Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/> > > > >> > LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter > > > >> > <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube > > > >> > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | > Github > > > >> > <https://github.com/seaseltd> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > On Wed, 4 Jan 2023 at 23:26, Michael Gibney < > mich...@michaelgibney.net> > > > >> > wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> > > This seems fine to me, assuming no objections from others. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 4:30 PM Alessandro Benedetti > > > >> > > <a.benede...@sease.io> wrote: > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > What about including this as well in 9.1.1 : > > > >> > > > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1255 ? > > > >> > > > It's an annoying neural search bug, and it's pretty much > done, just > > > >> > > waiting > > > >> > > > for a few checks and then I'll merge it with the changes! > > > >> > > > -------------------------- > > > >> > > > *Alessandro Benedetti* > > > >> > > > Director @ Sease Ltd. > > > >> > > > *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer* > > > >> > > > *Apache Solr PMC Member* > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > e-mail: a.benede...@sease.io > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied > > > >> > > > Consulting | Training | Open Source > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/> > > > >> > > > LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter > > > >> > > > <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube > > > >> > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | > Github > > > >> > > > <https://github.com/seaseltd> > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 17:18, Shawn Heisey < > apa...@elyograg.org> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > On 1/3/23 08:05, Michael Gibney wrote: > > > >> > > > > > and possibly upgrade to Lucene 9.4 > > > >> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16442 > > > >> > > > > > particularly considering: > > > >> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11718 > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > It seems like a bad idea to upgrade a critical component to > a new > > > >> major > > > >> > > > > or minor version in a bugfix release, unless that upgrade > closes a > > > >> > > > > security vulnerability and is fairly limited in scope. I > don't > > > >> think > > > >> > > > > either of those applies. > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > Solr 9.1.0 includes Lucene 9.3.0. There are no further > 9.3.x > > > >> releases, > > > >> > > > > so we don't have that as an option. > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > The main concerns for all the above are classloading > issues. The > > > >> > > first > > > >> > > > > > one (SlotAcc) I think should be backported, since we know > it has > > > >> > > > > > manifested in the wild and it's a very self-contained fix. > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > My bias would be to NOT upgrade Lucene, for reasons > described > > > >> above. > > > >> > > > > The change on SOLR-16165 looks OK to me for a point release. > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > Thanks, > > > >> > > > > Shawn > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > > > >> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > > > >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > > > >> > > > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > > -- http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) http://www.the111shift.com (play)
