I'll cut the branch in a few days, so go for it and merge tomorrow. Please do add 9.2 as the Fix Version so that we can track this correctly.
- Houston On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 1:06 PM Andy Webb <andywebb1...@gmail.com> wrote: > hi Houston, > > I have https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16643 in progress - > would > like that to go into 9.2 if possible, but it's not critical. I'm away so > won't be in a position to merge that until this time tomorrow at the > earliest. It'll also be my first commit, and I want to make sure I'm doing > it right! I'm intending to join the Meetup to say hi to folk, could chat > about it then. > > thanks, > Andy > > > On Tue, 7 Mar 2023 at 15:18, Houston Putman <hous...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hey everyone, > > > > I am officially back and ready to begin the process for 9.2. How are we > > doing with regards to blockers right now? > > > > So I see 4 tickets that are tagged to 9.2 in JIRA but not completed. Do > we > > have updates for these items? > > > > - SOLR-16653 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16653> > > - SOLR-9168 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9168> > > - SOLR-8803 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8803> > > - SOLR-16681 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16681> > > (mentioned > > above) > > > > I also see work going on for the Lucene 9.5 upgrade. Do we want to block > > 9.2 on this upgrade, or do we want to wait for 9.3? I think I am leaning > > towards including Lucene 9.5 in Solr 9.2, but if we don't think it's > > feasible we can move forward without it. > > > > - Houston > > > > On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 3:49 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> > wrote: > > > > > I’m ok with documenting it as a limitation as a first step + throw a > http > > > 400 error. > > > > > > Jan Høydahl > > > > > > > 1. mar. 2023 kl. 08:21 skrev Mikhail Khludnev <m...@apache.org>: > > > > > > > > Hello, colleagues! > > > > How can we triage https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16681 > > > > Replacing uniqueKey field via fl doesn't work since 9.0? > > > > I don't have an elegant solution. Will we just declare it as a known > > > > bug/limitation? > > > > > > > >> On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 9:07 PM Houston Putman <hous...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >> Hey everyone, > > > >> > > > >> It's been a while since Solr 9.1 was released, and we have a ton of > > > great > > > >> things to show off in 9.2: > > > >> > > > >> - Jetty 10 > > > >> - JAX-RS > > > >> - Lucene 9.5 > > > >> > > > >> I volunteer to do the release starting in the week of March 6th, > > unless > > > >> anyone else objects or wants to do it themselves. > > > >> > > > >> - Houston > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Sincerely yours > > > > Mikhail Khludnev > > > > https://t.me/MUST_SEARCH > > > > A caveat: Cyrillic! > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > > > > > > > > >
