dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: "stream.body", "stream.url", "stream.file" usage Chris Hostetter
  • Re: "stream.body", "stream.url", "stream.file" usage Walter Underwood
  • Re: "stream.body", "stream.url", "stream.file" usage Eric Pugh
• [VOTE] Release Solr 9.10.0 RC1 Jan Høydahl
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 9.10.0 RC1 Jan Høydahl
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 9.10.0 RC1 Anshum Gupta
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 9.10.0 RC1 David Smiley
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 9.10.0 RC1 Arrieta, Alejandro
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 9.10.0 RC1 Houston Putman
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 9.10.0 RC1 Jason Gerlowski
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 9.10.0 RC1 Jan Høydahl
• Re: [JENKINS] Solr » Solr-Lint-main - Build # 356 - Still Failing! Ishan Chattopadhyaya
• Solr host and port variable names clean up David Eric Pugh
• new gradle task runDevSlim (PR) David Smiley
  • Re: new gradle task runDevSlim (PR) Rauf Aliev Rauf Aliev
  • Re: new gradle task runDevSlim (PR) David Smiley
• cuvs validateJarChecksums Workaround Brainstorming Jason Gerlowski
  • Re: cuvs validateJarChecksums Workaround Brainstorming Chris Hostetter
  • Re: cuvs validateJarChecksums Workaround Brainstorming Gus Heck
  • Re: cuvs validateJarChecksums Workaround Brainstorming Anshum Gupta
  • Re: cuvs validateJarChecksums Workaround Brainstorming Ishan Chattopadhyaya
  • Re: cuvs validateJarChecksums Workaround Brainstorming Ishan Chattopadhyaya
  • Re: cuvs validateJarChecksums Workaround Brainstorming Jason Gerlowski
  • Re: cuvs validateJarChecksums Workaround Brainstorming Chris Hostetter
  • Re: cuvs validateJarChecksums Workaround Brainstorming Piotr P. Karwasz
• Reminder - Dense Vector Group Monthly Meeting Kevin Liang (BLOOMBERG/ 919 3RD A)
  • Re:Reminder - Dense Vector Group Monthly Meeting Kevin Liang (BLOOMBERG/ 919 3RD A)
  • Re: Reminder - Dense Vector Group Monthly Meeting Rahul Goswami
  • Re: Reminder - Dense Vector Group Monthly Meeting Alessandro Benedetti
• New branch and feature freeze for Solr 9.10.0 Jan Høydahl
  • Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 9.10.0 Jan Høydahl
  • Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 9.10.0 David Smiley
• Fwd: New Book on Solr/Lucene Rauf Aliev Rauf Aliev
  • Re: New Book on Solr/Lucene Wei
  • Re: New Book on Solr/Lucene David Smiley
  • Re: New Book on Solr/Lucene Rauf Aliev Rauf Aliev
• Some metric renames for Solr 10 David Smiley
  • Re:Some metric renames for Solr 10 Matthew Biscocho (BLOOMBERG/ 919 3RD A)
  • Re: Some metric renames for Solr 10 David Smiley
• [PR] Add Docker support with Jib and GitHub Actions CI/CD [solr-mcp] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Docker support with Jib and GitHub Actions CI/CD [solr-mcp] via GitHub
• [PR] Apply spotless plugin [solr-mcp] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: add Docker support with Jib and GitHub Actions CI/CD [solr-mcp] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add Docker support with Jib and GitHub Actions CI/CD [solr-mcp] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add Docker support with Jib and GitHub Actions CI/CD [solr-mcp] via GitHub
• Re: [JENKINS] Solr-main-macOS (64bit/hotspot/jdk-25) - Build # 7376 - Still Failing! Chris Hostetter
• Re-thinking SolrInputDocument and SolrDocument in a "multi-valued vectors" world Chris Hostetter
  • Re: Re-thinking SolrInputDocument and SolrDocument in a "multi-valued vectors" world Jason Gerlowski
• [ANNOUNCEMENT] Transitioning to logchange-based changelog workflow Jan Høydahl
  • Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Transitioning to logchange-based changelog workflow Jan Høydahl
  • Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Transitioning to logchange-based changelog workflow Jan Høydahl
  • Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Transitioning to logchange-based changelog workflow Jan Høydahl
  • Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Transitioning to logchange-based changelog workflow David Smiley
  • Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Transitioning to logchange-based changelog workflow Anshum Gupta
  • Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Transitioning to logchange-based changelog workflow Anshum Gupta
  • Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Transitioning to logchange-based changelog workflow Jan Høydahl
  • Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Transitioning to logchange-based changelog workflow Gus Heck
  • Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Transitioning to logchange-based changelog workflow Anshum Gupta
  • Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Transitioning to logchange-based changelog workflow Anshum Gupta
  • Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Transitioning to logchange-based changelog workflow Anshum Gupta
  • Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Transitioning to logchange-based changelog workflow Jason Gerlowski
  • Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Transitioning to logchange-based changelog workflow Anshum Gupta
• Solr 9.5 distributed search tie breaking logic is non-deterministic Yue Yu
  • Re: Solr 9.5 distributed search tie breaking logic is non-deterministic Chris Hostetter
  • Re: Solr 9.5 distributed search tie breaking logic is non-deterministic Yue Yu
• [PROPOSAL] Release Solr 9.10.0 before 10.0.0 Jan Høydahl
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Release Solr 9.10.0 before 10.0.0 Anshum Gupta
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Release Solr 9.10.0 before 10.0.0 David Smiley
• [PR] Errorprone spotless [solr-mcp] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Errorprone spotless [solr-mcp] via GitHub
• [PR] [SOLR-17944] PR feedback - add spotless. [solr-mcp] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [SOLR-17944] PR feedback - add spotless. [solr-mcp] via GitHub
• New branch and feature freeze for Solr 10.0.0 Anshum Gupta
  • Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 10.0.0 James Dyer
  • Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 10.0.0 David Smiley
  • Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 10.0.0 Anshum Gupta
  • Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 10.0.0 Alessandro Benedetti
  • Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 10.0.0 Anshum Gupta
  • Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 10.0.0 Alessandro Benedetti
  • Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 10.0.0 David Smiley
  • Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 10.0.0 Anshum Gupta
  • Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 10.0.0 David Eric Pugh
  • Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 10.0.0 David Smiley
  • Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 10.0.0 Anshum Gupta
  • Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 10.0.0 David Smiley
  • Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 10.0.0 Anshum Gupta
  • Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 10.0.0 Houston Putman
  • Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 10.0.0 Matthew Biscocho (BLOOMBERG/ 120 PARK)
  • Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 10.0.0 Ishan Chattopadhyaya
  • Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 10.0.0 Jan Høydahl
  • Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 10.0.0 David Smiley
  • Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 10.0.0 Houston Putman
  • Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 10.0.0 Anshum Gupta
  • Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 10.0.0 Jan Høydahl
  • Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 10.0.0 Ishan Chattopadhyaya
  • Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 10.0.0 David Smiley
  • Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 10.0.0 Anshum Gupta
  • Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 10.0.0 Alessandro Benedetti
  • Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 10.0.0 Anshum Gupta
  • Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 10.0.0 Alessandro Benedetti
  • Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 10.0.0 Ishan Chattopadhyaya
  • Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 10.0.0 David Smiley
  • Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 10.0.0 Ishan Chattopadhyaya
  • Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 10.0.0 Alessandro Benedetti
  • Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 10.0.0 David Smiley
  • Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 10.0.0 Anshum Gupta
  • Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 10.0.0 Ishan Chattopadhyaya
  • Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 10.0.0 Rahul Goswami
  • Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 10.0.0 Rahul Goswami
  • Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 10.0.0 Jan Høydahl
  • Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 10.0.0 Anshum Gupta
  • Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 10.0.0 Anshum Gupta
  • Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 10.0.0 Jan Høydahl
  • Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 10.0.0 Chris Hostetter
  • Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 10.0.0 Andy Webb
  • Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 10.0.0 David Smiley
  • Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 10.0.0 Chris Hostetter
• [DISCUSS] Community Virtual Meetup, October 2025 Jason Gerlowski
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Community Virtual Meetup, October 2025 Jason Gerlowski
• lucene3/4 VMs Jenkins Disk Usage Robert Thomson
• resurrecting SOLR-17541: LBSolrClient implementations should agree on 'getClient()' semantics James Dyer
• SOLR-17930: Improving MultiAuthPlugin in Solr 10 Christos Malliaridis
  • Re: SOLR-17930: Improving MultiAuthPlugin in Solr 10 Christos Malliaridis
• [DISCUSS] Dense vector monthly meetup for this month Kevin Liang (BLOOMBERG/ 919 3RD A)
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Dense vector monthly meetup for this month Alessandro Benedetti
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Dense vector monthly meetup for this month Ishan Chattopadhyaya
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Dense vector monthly meetup for this month Rahul Goswami
• Test failures with CloudHttp2SolrClientTest#testHttpCspPerf James Dyer
  • Re: Test failures with CloudHttp2SolrClientTest#testHttpCspPerf David Smiley
  • Re: Test failures with CloudHttp2SolrClientTest#testHttpCspPerf Jason Gerlowski
• The state of PRS -- "experimental" David Smiley
  • Re: The state of PRS -- "experimental" Calvin Smith
  • Re: The state of PRS -- "experimental" David Smiley
  • Re: The state of PRS -- "experimental" Ishan Chattopadhyaya
  • Re: The state of PRS -- "experimental" Jan Høydahl
• Re: [JENKINS] Solr » Solr-Lint-main - Build # 334 - Still Failing! Chris Hostetter
  • Re: [JENKINS] Solr » Solr-Lint-main - Build # 334 - Still Failing! Ishan Chattopadhyaya
  • Re: [JENKINS] Solr » Solr-Lint-main - Build # 334 - Still Failing! Ishan Chattopadhyaya
  • Re: [JENKINS] Solr » Solr-Lint-main - Build # 334 - Still Failing! Ishan Chattopadhyaya
  • Re: [JENKINS] Solr » Solr-Lint-main - Build # 334 - Still Failing! Ishan Chattopadhyaya
• [PR] [SOLR-17944] Initial First party MCP support [solr-mcp] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [SOLR-17944] Initial First party MCP support [solr-mcp] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [SOLR-17944] Initial First party MCP support [solr-mcp] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [SOLR-17944] Initial First party MCP support [solr-mcp] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [SOLR-17944] Initial First party MCP support [solr-mcp] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [SOLR-17944] Initial First party MCP support [solr-mcp] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [SOLR-17944] Initial First party MCP support [solr-mcp] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [SOLR-17944] Initial First party MCP support [solr-mcp] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [SOLR-17944] Initial First party MCP support [solr-mcp] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [SOLR-17944] Initial First party MCP support [solr-mcp] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [SOLR-17944] Initial First party MCP support [solr-mcp] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [SOLR-17944] Initial First party MCP support [solr-mcp] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [SOLR-17944] Initial First party MCP support [solr-mcp] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [SOLR-17944] Initial First party MCP support [solr-mcp] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [SOLR-17944] Initial First party MCP support [solr-mcp] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [SOLR-17944] Initial First party MCP support [solr-mcp] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [SOLR-17944] Initial First party MCP support [solr-mcp] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [SOLR-17944] Initial First party MCP support [solr-mcp] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [SOLR-17944] Initial First party MCP support [solr-mcp] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [SOLR-17944] Initial First party MCP support [solr-mcp] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [SOLR-17944] Initial First party MCP support [solr-mcp] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [SOLR-17944] Initial First party MCP support [solr-mcp] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [SOLR-17944] Initial First party MCP support [solr-mcp] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [SOLR-17944] Initial First party MCP support [solr-mcp] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [SOLR-17944] Initial First party MCP support [solr-mcp] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [SOLR-17944] Initial First party MCP support [solr-mcp] via GitHub
• Accessibility issues in new experimental compose UI Jane Sandberg
  • Re: Accessibility issues in new experimental compose UI Christos Malliaridis
• Solr JWT guidance Tony Panza
  • Re: Solr JWT guidance Jan Høydahl
  • RE: Re: Solr JWT guidance Tony Panza
• [DISCUSS] SOLR-17949: Add Azure Blob Storage Backup Repository Module Prateek Singhal
  • Re: [DISCUSS] SOLR-17949: Add Azure Blob Storage Backup Repository Module Prateek Singhal
  • Re: [DISCUSS] SOLR-17949: Add Azure Blob Storage Backup Repository Module Jason Gerlowski
  • Re: [DISCUSS] SOLR-17949: Add Azure Blob Storage Backup Repository Module Prateek Singhal
  • Re: [DISCUSS] SOLR-17949: Add Azure Blob Storage Backup Repository Module Prateek Singhal
• [DISCUSS] Deprecate and remove XLSXResponseWriter Jan Høydahl
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecate and remove XLSXResponseWriter Tim Allison
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecate and remove XLSXResponseWriter David Smiley
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecate and remove XLSXResponseWriter Gus Heck
• Distributing the desktop client of the new UI with Solr 10 Christos Malliaridis
  • Re: Distributing the desktop client of the new UI with Solr 10 David Smiley
  • Re: Distributing the desktop client of the new UI with Solr 10 Christos Malliaridis
• LBHttp2SolrClientIntegrationTest.testTwoServers flaky David Smiley
• Why recovery requires commit? Kevin Liang (BLOOMBERG/ 919 3RD A)
  • Re: Why recovery requires commit? David Smiley
  • Re: Why recovery requires commit? Kevin Liang (BLOOMBERG/ 919 3RD A)
  • Re: Why recovery requires commit? David Smiley
• [DISCUSS] Use JRE 25 as base container image for Solr 10.x line Jan Høydahl
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Use JRE 25 as base container image for Solr 10.x line David Smiley
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Use JRE 25 as base container image for Solr 10.x line Eric Pugh
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Use JRE 25 as base container image for Solr 10.x line Ishan Chattopadhyaya
• [DISCUSS] Deprecate and remove TikaLanguageIdentifierUpdateProcessor Jan Høydahl
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecate and remove TikaLanguageIdentifierUpdateProcessor David Eric Pugh
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecate and remove TikaLanguageIdentifierUpdateProcessor Jan Høydahl
• Future of SolrCell (extraction module) Jan Høydahl
  • Re: Future of SolrCell (extraction module) Ishan Chattopadhyaya
  • Re: Future of SolrCell (extraction module) Christos Malliaridis
  • Re: Future of SolrCell (extraction module) Jan Høydahl
  • Re: Future of SolrCell (extraction module) Jan Høydahl

• Earlier messages
• Later messages