Hi.
Sorry, I should have made that clearer. I am planning the first RC for
tomorrow morning.

> Are bug fixes still allowed into the release branch until then?
Not really sure, maybe others can chime in? my guess is this can go in if
it is a blocker.

best,
alex



On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 9:45 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Can you please suggest when you're planning to spin the first RC? Are bug
> fixes still allowed into the release branch until then?
>
> On Wed, 4 Oct, 2023, 9:58 pm Alex Deparvu, <stilla...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Quick update, we are blocker free. Both issues have been resolved and as
> > far as I can see there is no pending issue for 9.4 anymore.
> >
> > best
> > alex
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 2:45 PM Walter Underwood <wun...@wunderwood.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I think this is missing a some words:
> > >
> > > "A new Always-On trace id generator and the rid parameter is being
> > > deprecated”
> > >
> > > Maybe “…generator has been added and…”? As it stands, it looks like the
> > > new trace id generator is being deprecated.
> > >
> > > The circuit breaker descriptions are accurate, but probably do not need
> > to
> > > be capitalized. In general, there seem to be extra capitalizations,
> like
> > > “Always-On” and “Backup, Restore, and Split”.
> > >
> > > wunder
> > > Walter Underwood
> > > wun...@wunderwood.org
> > > http://observer.wunderwood.org/  (my blog)
> > >
> > > > On Oct 3, 2023, at 2:00 PM, Alex Deparvu <stilla...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Please update the draft release notes if you have any suggestions:
> > > >
> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/ReleaseNote9_4_0
> > > >
> > > > best,
> > > > alex
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 11:26 AM Alex Deparvu <stilla...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> NOTICE:
> > > >>
> > > >> Branch branch_9_4 has been cut and versions updated to 9.5 on stable
> > the
> > > >> branch.
> > > >>
> > > >> Please observe the normal rules:
> > > >>
> > > >> * No new features may be committed to the branch.
> > > >> * Documentation patches, build patches and serious bug fixes may be
> > > >>  committed to the branch. However, you should submit all patches you
> > > >>  want to commit to Jira first to give others the chance to review
> > > >>  and possibly vote against the patch. Keep in mind that it is our
> > > >>  main intention to keep the branch as stable as possible.
> > > >> * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be
> > committed
> > > >>  to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then
> into
> > > >>  the current release branch.
> > > >> * Normal unstable and stable branch development may continue as
> usual.
> > > >>  However, if you plan to commit a big change to the unstable branch
> > > >>  while the branch feature freeze is in effect, think twice: can't
> the
> > > >>  addition wait a couple more days? Merges of bug fixes into the
> branch
> > > >>  may become more difficult.
> > > >> * Only Jira issues with Fix version 9.4 and priority "Blocker" will
> > > delay
> > > >>  a release candidate build.
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to