Alright looks like the last blocker has been merged - I'll start on the RC this morning!
On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 8:57 AM Jason Gerlowski <gerlowsk...@gmail.com> wrote: > Alright - everything looks pretty good on the Lucene 9.9.2 upgrade front. > > We still have one "blocker" for cutting 9.5 RC1 - SOLR-17068. It looks > like there's an approved PR for that ticket ( > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2227) but I know there's been some > discussion of the overall approach there. (See the "CLI: bin/solr bin/post > bin/postlogs -- what's happening" thread). Are we still planning to target > 9.5 for this ticket? If so, is there a plan to get it merged? > > As soon as SOLR-17068 is wrapped up I'll start on 9.5 RC1. > > Best, > > Jason > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 1:39 PM Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) < > cpoersc...@bloomberg.net> wrote: > >> Thanks! https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17142 created for it, >> not a blocker for 9.5 I think. >> >> From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 01/30/24 18:28:23 UTCTo: >> dev@solr.apache.org >> Subject: Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 9.5.0 >> >> Christine - David brought this up a few months ago - >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/hlh1bmtgnmp55q8knhjtltf8t57pbl5q >> >> Kevin Risden >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 1:07 PM Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) < >> cpoersc...@bloomberg.net> wrote: >> >> > Unrelated to baking times, I stumbled across a "unreferenced files under >> > license folder" mystery: >> > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2178#issuecomment-1917513343 >> > >> > Could someone try to reproduce the "running clean once and then >> precommit >> > twice" sequence? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Christine >> > >> > From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 01/30/24 15:15:30 UTCTo: >> > dev@solr.apache.org >> > Subject: Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 9.5.0 >> > >> > Maybe? Obviously that was my initial plan as I mentioned above. But I >> was >> > pleasantly surprised to see the number of folks that chimed in with >> their >> > own test results and +1's on Nazerke's Lucene-upgrade PR. It seemed >> > comparable to the data points we'd get out of a multi-day "bake" in >> > Jenkins. So I figured we might expedite the baking, or at least let it >> > "bake" in parallel while I work on the RC. >> > >> > But I can also wait an additional few days if folks think it's >> > necessary/valuable? >> > >> > (Also worth mentioning that this is still theoretical at this point - >> we're >> > still waiting on a fix for SOLR-17068 unless Eric changes his mind about >> > getting it in 9.5.) >> > >> > On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 9:32 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >> > ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > > Should we wait at least 2-3 days for the Lucene 9.9.2 upgrade to bake >> > > before we cut a release? >> > > >> > > On Tue, 30 Jan, 2024, 7:50 pm Jason Gerlowski, <gerlowsk...@gmail.com >> > >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > > > Yes - I saw that right after my last email. Thanks for all your >> work >> > on >> > > > that Nazerke! I've merged and backported that PR; we're now on >> Lucene >> > > > 9.9.2! >> > > > >> > > > As soon as Eric's P #2227 is merged and backported I'll start on our >> > RC! >> > > > >> > > > Best, >> > > > >> > > > Jason >> > > > >> > > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 7:33 AM Nazerke S <sn1.naze...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > Hi Jason, >> > > > > >> > > > > fyi, we have an open PR <https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2176 >> > >for >> > > > the >> > > > > Lucene upgrade (v9.9.2) waiting for review. >> > > > > >> > > > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 6:21 PM Jason Gerlowski < >> > gerlowsk...@gmail.com >> > > > >> > > > > wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > > I'm working on the Lucene upgrade now. That will still need >> some >> > > time >> > > > in >> > > > > > review (and maybe a day to let tests bake?), so I'm fine if you >> > > > backport >> > > > > > SOLR-17068 in that timeframe. But let's draw the line once the >> > > Lucene >> > > > > > 9.9.2 upgrade is in, unless something else urgent comes up. >> I'll >> > > > target >> > > > > > Wednesday or Thursday for the Solr RC1. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Jason >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 4:15 PM Eric Pugh < >> > > > > ep...@opensourceconnections.com >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Jason, I tackled SOLR-17068 (the one you reminded me of) and >> I’d >> > > love >> > > > > to >> > > > > > > get it into 9.5 since right now we have a terrible mish mash >> of >> > > > > bin/solr >> > > > > > > post and bin/post in the ref guide and docs. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Could someone review https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2227 >> > and >> > > if >> > > > > it >> > > > > > > looks good could we sneak it into 9.5? >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Eric >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > On Jan 26, 2024, at 6:29 PM, Eric Pugh < >> > > > > > ep...@opensourceconnections.com> >> > > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Backport to branch_9_5 is done. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> On Jan 26, 2024, at 1:11 PM, Jason Gerlowski < >> > > > gerlowsk...@gmail.com >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> Go ahead and backport on your own! I'm still waiting on >> > Lucene >> > > > > 9.9.2, >> > > > > > > so >> > > > > > > >> there shouldn't be any branch-contention on my end. >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> Relatedly, Lucene has their RC1 out there and things look >> > good a >> > > > day >> > > > > > or >> > > > > > > two >> > > > > > > >> into their VOTE, so with any luck we'll be able to get a >> Solr >> > > 9.5 >> > > > RC >> > > > > > > >> together early next week! >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> Best, >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> Jason >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 8:49 AM Eric Pugh < >> ep...@apache.org> >> > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >>> I am about to merge SOLR-17112, and will backport it to >> > > > branch_9x. >> > > > > > > Jason, >> > > > > > > >>> do you backport it over to the branch_9_5 or do I? >> > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > >>> ERic >> > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > >>> On 2024/01/23 19:08:10 Jason Gerlowski wrote: >> > > > > > > >>>>> It was hoped SOLR-17112 would make 9.4.1 but it didn't >> as >> > no >> > > PR >> > > > > was >> > > > > > > >>>> proposed. >> > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> SOLR-17120 [is] nominated for inclusion in the 9.5.0 >> > release >> > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > >>>> Those both sound quick and reasonable; they've got a +1 >> from >> > > me >> > > > to >> > > > > > go >> > > > > > > >>> into >> > > > > > > >>>> 9.5 (assuming the contributor decides to continue with >> > > > > SOLR-17112). >> > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> Considering Lucene 9.9.2 is being planned, I think it >> would >> > > be >> > > > > > better >> > > > > > > >>> to >> > > > > > > >>>>> upgrade Solr to the to-be-released version so users >> have to >> > > > deal >> > > > > > with >> > > > > > > >>>>> fewer upgrade cycles. >> > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > >>>> Yeah, that might be best; I hadn't realized we weren't >> > already >> > > > on >> > > > > > the >> > > > > > > >>>> latest Lucene 9.x. I've created SOLR-17128 to track our >> > > Lucene >> > > > > > > upgrade >> > > > > > > >>>> once 9.9.2 is available. >> > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > >>>> Obviously this is a longer delay than some of the tickets >> > > above, >> > > > > and >> > > > > > > will >> > > > > > > >>>> mean we won't be cutting a Solr RC this week. We can >> pick a >> > > new >> > > > > > date >> > > > > > > for >> > > > > > > >>>> the initial Solr 9.5 RC once Lucene 9.9.2 is available. >> > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > >>>> Best, >> > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > >>>> Jason >> > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > >>>> On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 1:37 PM Anshum Gupta < >> > > > > > ans...@anshumgupta.net> >> > > > > > > >>> wrote: >> > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> Considering Lucene 9.9.2 is being planned, I think it >> would >> > > be >> > > > > > better >> > > > > > > >>> to >> > > > > > > >>>>> upgrade Solr to the to-be-released version so users >> have to >> > > > deal >> > > > > > with >> > > > > > > >>> fewer >> > > > > > > >>>>> upgrade cycles. >> > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> To highlight, there are about 90 odd changes in the >> Lucene >> > > > 9.9.x >> > > > > > > line. >> > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> -Anshum >> > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 8:47 AM David Smiley < >> > > > dsmi...@apache.org >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>> wrote: >> > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>> FYI It was hoped SOLR-17112 >> > > > > > > >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17112 >> > "bin/solr >> > > > > script >> > > > > > > >>>>>> doesn't do ps properly on some systems" would make >> 9.4.1 >> > but >> > > > it >> > > > > > > >>> didn't >> > > > > > > >>>>>> as no PR was proposed. There still isn't one but a >> > > > contributor >> > > > > is >> > > > > > > >>>>>> thinking about it. >> > > > > > > >>>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>> On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 11:30 AM Christine Poerschke >> > > > (BLOOMBERG/ >> > > > > > > >>>>>> LONDON) <cpoersc...@bloomberg.net> wrote: >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> Just to cross-reference things further (Jason is >> already >> > > > aware) >> > > > > > -- >> > > > > > > >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17120 and >> > > > > > > >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2214 are nominated >> > for >> > > > > > > >>> inclusion in >> > > > > > > >>>>>> the 9.5 release, and as always additional reviews and >> > inputs >> > > > are >> > > > > > > >>> welcome. >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> Regards, >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> Christine >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 01/22/24 17:30:35 >> UTCTo: >> > > > > > > >>>>>> dev@solr.apache.org >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> Subject: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 9.5.0 >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> NOTICE: >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> Branch branch_9_5 has been cut and versions updated to >> > 9.6 >> > > on >> > > > > the >> > > > > > > >>>>> stable >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> branch. >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> Please observe the normal rules: >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> * No new features may be committed to the branch. >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> * Documentation patches, build patches and serious bug >> > > fixes >> > > > > may >> > > > > > be >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> committed to the branch. However, you should submit >> all >> > > > > patches >> > > > > > > >>> you >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> want to commit to Jira first to give others the >> chance >> > to >> > > > > review >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> and possibly vote against the patch. Keep in mind >> that >> > it >> > > is >> > > > > our >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> main intention to keep the branch as stable as >> possible. >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> * All patches that are intended for the branch should >> > first >> > > > be >> > > > > > > >>>>> committed >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> to the unstable branch, merged into the stable >> branch, >> > and >> > > > > then >> > > > > > > >>> into >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> the current release branch. >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> * Normal unstable and stable branch development may >> > > continue >> > > > as >> > > > > > > >>> usual. >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> However, if you plan to commit a big change to the >> > > unstable >> > > > > > > >>> branch >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> while the branch feature freeze is in effect, think >> > twice: >> > > > > can't >> > > > > > > >>> the >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> addition wait a couple more days? Merges of bug fixes >> > into >> > > > the >> > > > > > > >>> branch >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> may become more difficult. >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> * Only Jira issues with Fix version 9.5 and priority >> > > > "Blocker" >> > > > > > will >> > > > > > > >>>>> delay >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> a release candidate build. >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> The feature-freeze for the 9.5 release will go till >> the >> > end >> > > > of >> > > > > > this >> > > > > > > >>>>> week >> > > > > > > >>>>>> - >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> I'll aim to create our first RC on Thursday, January >> > 25th. >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> Best, >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> Jason >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>> >> > > > > > > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > > > > > > >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >> dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org >> > > > > > > >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: >> dev-h...@solr.apache.org >> > > > > > > >>>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> -- >> > > > > > > >>>>> Anshum Gupta >> > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > > > > > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org >> > > > > > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org >> > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > _______________________ >> > > > > > > > Eric Pugh | Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC | >> > > > > 434.466.1467 >> > > > > > | >> > > > > > > http://www.opensourceconnections.com < >> > > > > > > http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> | My Free/Busy < >> > > > > > > http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal> >> > > > > > > > Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed < >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> >> https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterpri >> > se-search-server-third-edition-raw >> > >> < >> https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw >> > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is >> > > considered >> > > > to >> > > > > > be >> > > > > > > Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, >> > regardless >> > > > of >> > > > > > > whether attachments are marked as such. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > _______________________ >> > > > > > > Eric Pugh | Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC | >> > > > 434.466.1467 >> > > > > | >> > > > > > > http://www.opensourceconnections.com < >> > > > > > > http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> | My Free/Busy < >> > > > > > > http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal> >> > > > > > > Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed < >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> >> https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterpri >> > se-search-server-third-edition-raw >> > >> < >> https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw >> > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is >> > considered >> > > to >> > > > > be >> > > > > > > Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, >> > regardless >> > > > of >> > > > > > > whether attachments are marked as such. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> >> >>
