Ok, so I pulled your recent commit that explicitly disabled PRS and it
passed. I wonder why the "-Duse.perreplica" flag is not working.

Anyways, if you are ok with this being a pretty bad bug for PRS
collections, then we can move forward with the release.

- Houston

On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 7:18 AM Noble Paul <noble.p...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm running it as follows
>
> ant test  -Dtestcase=CloudAuthStreamTest -Dtests.seed=F8952559841D5C83
> -Dtests.multiplier=2 -Dtests.slow=true -Dtests.locale=sk
> -Dtests.timezone=Atlantic/Bermuda -Dtests.asserts=true
> -Dtests.file.encoding=UTF-8 -Duse.perreplica=false
>
> On Sat, Feb 3, 2024 at 12:17 AM Noble Paul <noble.p...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > are you sure you are able to make the test fail with the seed ? Can
> > you please confirm it
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 4:29 AM Houston Putman <hous...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Any news Noble?
> > >
> > > I'm not comfortable moving forward without a fix for this, and we
> really do
> > > need to get an 8.11.3 out there soon.
> > >
> > > - Houston
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 12:27 PM Noble Paul <noble.p...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I beasted this test a few 100 times and it was not failing. I shall
> > > > try this again (with the seed)
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 4:08 AM Houston Putman <hous...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > When I run this:
> > > > >
> > > > > ant test  -Dtestcase=CloudAuthStreamTest
> -Dtests.seed=F8952559841D5C83
> > > > > > -Dtests.multiplier=2 -Dtests.slow=true -Dtests.locale=sk
> > > > > > -Dtests.timezone=Atlantic/Bermuda -Dtests.asserts=true
> > > > > > -Dtests.file.encoding=UTF-8 -Duse.perreplica=false
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > It fails. Doesn't the "-Duse.perreplica=false" tell it to not use
> PRS?
> > > > >
> > > > > - Houston
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 5:25 AM Noble Paul <noble.p...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > What I have noticed is that CloudAuthStreamTest fails in PRS
> mode. So,
> > > > > > it passes all the time without PRS.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It needs to be fixed anyway, but I'm disabling the PRS mode for
> that
> > > > test
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sat, Jan 27, 2024 at 4:28 AM Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/
> > > > > > LONDON) <cpoersc...@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks! Done.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 01/25/24 14:42:10 UTCTo:
> > > > > > dev@solr.apache.org
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.11.3
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Not too late, please continue with the back port Christine’
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > - Houston
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 3:58 AM Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/
> > > > LONDON) <
> > > > > > > cpoersc...@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > If it's not too late I'd like to nominate
> > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17120 via
> > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2683 for being
> in the
> > > > > > 8.11.3
> > > > > > > > release too.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > - Christine
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 01/25/24 00:20:16 UTCTo:
> > > > > > > > dev@solr.apache.org
> > > > > > > > Subject: Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.11.3
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > But the "CloudAuthStreamTest" test fails 100% of the time
> with
> > > > the
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Yes.Thanks for bringing it to my attention. I'm looking into
> it and
> > > > > > > > trying to fix that
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 9:02 AM Houston Putman <
> hous...@apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I'm unsure about the hdfs issues for now..
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > But the "CloudAuthStreamTest" test fails 100% of the time
> with
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > > "F8952559841D5C83" seed for me. And it's not a test issue,
> its an
> > > > > > actual
> > > > > > > > > bug.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I've been focusing my efforts here, but it fails both with
> PRS
> > > > > > enabled
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > disabled. So the patch went beyond just adjusting how PRS
> is
> > > > handled.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Honestly at this point I'm not sure what is the cause, and
> I
> > > > can't
> > > > > > really
> > > > > > > > > put more time into it. I'll leave the rest of my findings
> on the
> > > > > > JIRA.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - Houston
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 8:53 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
> > > > > > > > > ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I ran the solr/core tests few times, and here are the
> results:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 1)
> > > > > > > > > > [junit4] Tests with failures [seed: 7A919DB0B1698A5]:
> > > > > > > > > > [junit4] - org.apache.solr.search.TestRecoveryHdfs
> (suite)
> > > > [junit4]
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 2)
> > > > > > > > > > BUILD SUCCESSFUL
> > > > > > > > > > Total time: 4 minutes 31 seconds
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 3)
> > > > > > > > > >    [junit4] Tests with failures [seed: E174107AF681900D]:
> > > > > > > > > >    [junit4]   -
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> org.apache.solr.filestore.TestDistribPackageStore.testPackageStoreManagement
> > > > > > > > > >    [junit4]   -
> org.apache.solr.cloud.hdfs.HdfsRecoverLeaseTest
> > > > > > (suite)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 4)
> > > > > > > > > >    [junit4] Tests with failures [seed: 6135443D8851EC4F]:
> > > > > > > > > >    [junit4]   -
> org.apache.solr.store.hdfs.HdfsDirectoryTest
> > > > > > (suite)
> > > > > > > > > >    [junit4]   -
> org.apache.solr.cloud.hdfs.HdfsRecoverLeaseTest
> > > > > > (suite)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 5)
> > > > > > > > > >    [junit4] Tests with failures [seed: 967F9EA7B1CB4A4F]:
> > > > > > > > > >    [junit4]   -
> org.apache.solr.index.hdfs.CheckHdfsIndexTest
> > > > > > (suite)
> > > > > > > > > >    [junit4]   -
> org.apache.solr.cloud.hdfs.HdfsNNFailoverTest
> > > > > > (suite)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 6)
> > > > > > > > > >    [junit4] Tests with failures [seed: 22B4F78C758D19E4]:
> > > > > > > > > >    [junit4]   -
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > org.apache.solr.cloud.api.collections.TestHdfsCloudBackupRestore
> > > > > > > > (suite)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I think the frequency of these HDFS failures have
> increased
> > > > since
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > Hadoop upgrade 3.2.2 -> 3.2.4 (
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/commit/3cf0a5501084c9e3d0e53657a20477007f3
> > > > > > > > 3755a
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > <
> > > > > >
> > > >
> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/commit/3cf0a5501084c9e3d0e53657a20477007f33755a
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > ).
> > > > > > > > > > Any ideas, please, on how to deal with them?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 at 07:12, Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
> > > > > > > > > > ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Looking at it, ASAP.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 24 Jan, 2024, 2:07 am Houston Putman, <
> > > > > > hous...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >> Right now we are blocked on
> > > > > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16580,
> > > > > > > > > > >> which introduced failures that pop up roughly 50% of
> the
> > > > time
> > > > > > or so.
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >> We can't really proceed until the issue is fixed, as
> I don't
> > > > > > think
> > > > > > > > it's
> > > > > > > > > > >> necessarily a test issue.
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >> - Houston
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >> On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 10:10 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> <
> > > > > > > > > > >> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >> > +1
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > >> > On Sun, 21 Jan, 2024, 8:47 am Houston Putman, <
> > > > > > hous...@apache.org
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > >> > > Now that 9.4 is out, we should plan this for next
> week.
> > > > Ill
> > > > > > try
> > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > get
> > > > > > > > > > >> > > stuff ready for a monday RC, if no one objects.
> > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > >> > > - Houston
> > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > >> > > On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 12:58 PM Houston Putman <
> > > > > > > > > > >> houstonput...@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > >> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > Since the 9.4.1 release candidate is out, I'm
> fine
> > > > waiting
> > > > > > > > for it
> > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > finish. But let's try to get 8.11.3 out very
> soon
> > > > > > afterwards.
> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > Also, as I stated on the other thread, didn't
> mean to
> > > > > > tread on
> > > > > > > > > > your
> > > > > > > > > > >> > toes
> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > here. If you want to continue with the release,
> > > > please do!
> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > - Houston
> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 8:59 AM Ishan
> Chattopadhyaya <
> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> Shouldn't we wait for the 9.4.1 to go out
> first?
> > > > That's
> > > > > > what
> > > > > > > > I
> > > > > > > > > > was
> > > > > > > > > > >> > > holding
> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> out on.
> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> On Sat, 13 Jan, 2024, 12:43 am Houston Putman,
> <
> > > > > > > > > > hous...@apache.org
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > NOTICE:
> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > I am now preparing for a bugfix release from
> branch
> > > > > > > > branch_8_11
> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > Please observe the normal rules for
> committing to
> > > > this
> > > > > > > > branch:
> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > * Before committing to the branch, reply to
> this
> > > > > > thread and
> > > > > > > > > > argue
> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> >   why the fix needs backporting and how long
> it
> > > > will
> > > > > > take.
> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > * All issues accepted for backporting should
> be
> > > > marked
> > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > > >> 8.11.3
> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> >   in JIRA, and issues that should delay the
> release
> > > > > > must be
> > > > > > > > > > >> marked
> > > > > > > > > > >> > as
> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > Blocker
> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > * All patches that are intended for the
> branch
> > > > should
> > > > > > > > first be
> > > > > > > > > > >> > > committed
> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> >   to the unstable branch, merged into the
> stable
> > > > > > branch,
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > then
> > > > > > > > > > >> > into
> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> >   the current release branch.
> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > * Only Jira issues with Fix version 8.11.3
> and
> > > > priority
> > > > > > > > > > "Blocker"
> > > > > > > > > > >> > will
> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > delay
> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> >   a release candidate build.
> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > -----------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > Noble Paul
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > -----------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > Noble Paul
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > -----------------------------------------------------
> > > > Noble Paul
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > -----------------------------------------------------
> > Noble Paul
>
>
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Noble Paul
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to