Do people want to spend the next ten years explaining that the the alerting feature is called “Luwak”? I’d call it “Alerting” or “Alerts". —wonder
> On May 1, 2024, at 1:16 PM, Houston Putman <hous...@apache.org> wrote: > > I think I'd prefer a more self-descriptive name than "Luwak", which is just > a product name that was decided a while ago. > > I kind of like "search-alerts". "query-alerts" sounds like alerting on > query metrics, but IMO "search-alerts" doesn't come with the same baggage. > > Luwak is fine though if everyone agrees on that. > > On one hand we have a number of committers here from >> Bloomberg, yet the abandoned and now-removed "analytics" component >> shows that abandonment is a risk nonetheless. >> > > I don't want to bikeshed here, but I'm not sure this is a fair > assessment of what happened with the analytics module. > Sure there wasn't a ton of development, but in general it was feature rich > and had very little feature requests. > It was removed in 10, because a lack of user usage, not because it was > "abandoned" IMO. If there were requests from users > to keep it or improve it, then it would be a much different story. The > whole "thrown over the wall" comment is fair, but > not particularly relevant to this PR, which is being worked on in public. > > I think this is certainly something that can start in the sandbox and move > into the main repo once it's clear that there is interest from > multiple committers and community members in using and maintaining it. > > - Houston > > On Wed, May 1, 2024 at 2:32 PM David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Luwak is good to me! >> >> On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 4:01 PM Luke Kot-Zaniewski (BLOOMBERG/ 919 3RD >> A) <lkotzanie...@bloomberg.net> wrote: >>> >>> I love the name "luwak"! I was about to suggest the same but was worried >> about the trademark concerns and I assumed there was a reason they changed >> the name when donating it to lucene. >>> >>> From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 04/30/24 15:56:22 UTC-4:00To: >> dev@solr.apache.org >>> Subject: Re: solr query alerting >>> >>> Luwak is the original name of the Lucene monitor, contributed by Flax >> back in >>> the days: https://github.com/flaxsearch/luwak >>> >>> Perhaps we could go full circle (if no trademark issues) to call it the >> Solr >>> luwak module? Luwak is a type of coffee, and thus related to percolator >> 😉 >>> >>> Otherwise “stored-queries” is an option. >>> >>> Jan Høydahl >>> >>>> 30. apr. 2024 kl. 19:26 skrev David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org>: >>>> >>>> I agree the feature is relevant / useful. >>>> >>>> Another angle on the module vs sandbox or wherever else is maintenance >>>> cost. If a lot of code is being contributed as is here, then as a PMC >>>> member I hope to get a subjective sense that folks are interested in >>>> maintaining it. On one hand we have a number of committers here from >>>> Bloomberg, yet the abandoned and now-removed "analytics" component >>>> shows that abandonment is a risk nonetheless. I don't know how to >>>> conclude this thought but I'm hoping to hear from folks that they >>>> intend to look after this module. It's not just being "thrown over >>>> the wall", so to speak. >>>> >>>> Naming is hard... >>>> * ...-monitor-....: sorry I hate it >>>> * ...-percolator-.... No clue why this was chosen for ElasticSearch. >>>> I can appreciate a curious/non-obvious name like this that is not >>>> going to conflict with anyone's guesses at what a general name might >>>> convey. >>>> * "indexed-queries" or "query-indexing" would be a good name? This is >>>> the best technical name I can think of. >>>> * "reverse search" came to mind (based on the Netflix article) >>>> although that makes me think of leading-wildcard / suffix-search. >>>> * "inverted-search" >>>> * "indexed-query-alerts" incorporates "alerts" thus might better >>>> convey the use-case >>>> >>>>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 3:53 PM Luke Kot-Zaniewski (BLOOMBERG/ 919 3RD >>>>> A) <lkotzanie...@bloomberg.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi All, >>>>> >>>>> A few months ago I wrote the user list about potentially integrating >> lucene >>> monitor into solr. I have raised this PR with a first attempt at >> implementing >>> this integration. I'd greatly appreciate any feedback on this even >> though I >>> still have it marked as draft. I want to make sure I'm heading in the >> right >>> direction here so input from solr dev community would be extremely >> valuable :-) >>>>> >>>>> Many thanks, >>>>> Luke >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org >>>> >>> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
