+1, not binding SUCCESS! [0:47:08.218950]
Thanks, Pierre Le dim. 18 janv. 2026 à 21:23, Arrieta, Alejandro < [email protected]> a écrit : > Hello Team, > > +1 non binding. > SUCCESS! [0:41:24.267444] > > Kind Regards, > Alejandro Arrieta > > On Sun, Jan 18, 2026 at 4:54 PM Jan Høydahl <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi > > > > I change my vote to +1, leaving it up to you Jason. I think it is more > > important to get a bugfix release out the door than 100% correct > changelog > > in the tarball. > > > > Jan > > > > > 16. jan. 2026 kl. 16:53 skrev Jan Høydahl <[email protected]>: > > > > > > I think it’s a -0 > > > We can patch the online changelog. > > > > > > Jan Høydahl > > > > > >> 16. jan. 2026 kl. 16:20 skrev Jason Gerlowski <[email protected] > >: > > >> > > >> Hey all, > > >> > > >> Thanks for pointing out the changelog issues Jan. Do we think this > > >> merits a re-spin in its own right, or is it a "-0" sort of concern? > > >> > > >> Best, > > >> > > >> Jason > > >> > > >>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 6:33 PM Jan Høydahl <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >>> > > >>> I'm afraid there are changelog issues in RC2 as well > > >>> > > >>> - There's a file in changelog/unreleased folder. In a release there > > should never be any > > >>> - The HTML changelog is not re-generated before release > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.10.1-RC2-rev-c135e6335c7158fa26e96b0dc386f825255b47c0/solr/9.10.1/changes/Changes.html#v9.10.1.fixed > > >>> - The 9.10.1 section contains a release date 2026-01-08. That date is > > wrong by a whole lot. we should not use a date at all for the current > > release. > > >>> > > >>> I'm working on some additions to smoke tester in > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-18070 to catch things like > > this.. > > >>> > > >>> Jan > > >>> > > >>>>> 15. jan. 2026 kl. 17:46 skrev Rich Bowen <[email protected]>: > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> On 2026/01/15 15:43:43 Jason Gerlowski wrote: > > >>>>> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Solr 9.10.1 > > >>>>> [ ] +1 approve > > >>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion > > >>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> +1 (non-binding) > > >>>> > > >>>> * Verified signatures and hashes on the following files as per > > https://apache.org/info/verification.html > > >>>> - solr-9.10.1-slim.tgz (SHA512, GPG signature) > > >>>> - solr-9.10.1-src.tgz (SHA512, GPG signature) > > >>>> - solr-9.10.1.tgz (SHA512, GPG signature) > > >>>> * Verified LICENSE and NOTICE files > > >>>> > > >>>> FWIW, the NOTICE files have 2025 dates in them. This is *definitely* > > not a show-stopper, but perhaps something to tweak for next time. > > >>>> > > >>>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > >>>> > > >>> > > >> > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > >> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > >
