I've looked at the two security issues that were submitted, and both only apply 
to a non authenticated Solr setup, which means we would use "Response E: Reject 
— no authentication configured or behavior within expected role"

https://solr.apache.org/security-reporting.html

I haven't gone through the full lifecycle of a security process, so still 
figuring out all the admin steps.

ERic





On 2026/04/24 19:00:15 Eric Pugh wrote:
> Can you follow up with me on Slack?  I looked at security@ going back to 
> November and nothing stood out as Solr MCP specific.  I know we had a couple 
> of dependencies around the Spring AI libraries that we merged recently that 
> maybe caused some issues.   
> 
> On 2026/04/24 15:52:58 Jason Gerlowski wrote:
> > Hey Eric,
> > 
> > I'll refer you to our "security@" mailing list for specifics, but in
> > general there have been a handful of reports on our "security@"
> > mailing list that relate to the "Solr MCP" project.
> > 
> > I guess those have been relatively low-priority up to this point since
> > the "Solr MCP" project doesn't have any releases.  But if you're
> > starting to consider an RC for Solr MCP 1.0, we probably need to
> > triage those reports.  Maybe they'll end up being false-alarms, but
> > it'll be hard for folks to vote positively on an RC if there are
> > security questions that haven't even been investigated yet.
> > 
> > Just a heads up / my 2c.
> > 
> > Best,
> > 
> > Jason
> > 
> > 
> > On Thu, Apr 23, 2026 at 3:39 PM David Eric Pugh via dev
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > > Aditya and I are going to try and navigate using the Apache Trusted 
> > > Release process to get a candidate 1.0 release of the Solr MCP project.   
> > > We're getting some handholding tomorrow (Friday April 24) at 11 AM EST 
> > > from some of the ASF Infra people (including the all important, how do I 
> > > sign this thing?).
> > > I will post the zoom link in our slack channels if anyone wants to join 
> > > and see how things go.
> > > If all goes well, you should see some emails about the release candidate.
> > > We still have some work to do on refactoring the documentation, but we 
> > > have the candidate website ready to go once there is something to point 
> > > to!
> > > I didn't want to surprise anyone.
> > > Eric
> > 
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > 
> > 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to