On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 07:56:47PM -0700, Justin Mason wrote: > Justin Mason writes: > > Michael Parker writes: > > > On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 05:02:58PM -0700, Daniel Quinlan wrote: > > > > > > > > So the slightly changed version would leave: > > > > > > > > the classic report as: ASSERT CLASS=SPAM SET=LOCAL,REMOTE > > > > the classic revoke as: ASSERT CLASS=HAM SET=LOCAL REMOVE=REMOTE > > > > > > > > > > I like this version better. But, I think we might want make it more > > > http like, so it would be something like: > > > > > > ASSERT SPAMC/2.0 > > > Class: SPAM > > > Set: LOCAL, REMOTE > > > > > > and > > > > > > ASSERT SPAMC/2.0 > > > Class: HAM > > > Set: LOCAL > > > Remove: REMOTE > > > > ah, good idea! (fwiw I'd prefer lower-case, too. ;) > > btw to be clear -- I like the multiple-header route over the > "ASSERT CLASS=HAM SET=LOCAL" type. I'm not saying I now > like the "ASSERT" verb ;) >
Ok, I'm going to start working on this. We can decide on the verb and update later. Michael
pgp5r2SHO7EGI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
