-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

btw, would a name prefix sound like a good idea for a convention to
indicate "rules that exist to catch never-seen-in-the-wild spammer
exploits"?  Something like "EVIL" or similar?

it'd provide a great way to (a) visually see that those rules not
firing is not a problem in hit-frequencies output, and (b) grep
them out for the same purpose.

- --j.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Author: quinlan
> Date: Sun Nov 21 14:49:14 2004
> New Revision: 106135
> 
> Modified:
>    spamassassin/trunk/rules/20_head_tests.cf
>    spamassassin/trunk/rules/50_scores.cf
> Log:
> promote T_FRAGMENTED_MESSAGE to FRAGMENTED_MESSAGE
> 
> Modified: spamassassin/trunk/rules/20_head_tests.cf
> Url:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/spamassassin/trunk/rules/20_head_tests.cf?view=diff&rev=106135&p1=spamassassin/trunk/rules/20_head_tests.cf&r1=106134&p2=spamassassin/trunk/rules/20_head_tests.cf&r2=106135
> ==============================================================================
> --- spamassassin/trunk/rules/20_head_tests.cf (original)
> +++ spamassassin/trunk/rules/20_head_tests.cf Sun Nov 21 14:49:14 2004
> @@ -27,6 +27,12 @@
>  header HEAD_LONG             eval:check_for_long_header()
>  describe HEAD_LONG           Message headers are very long
>  
> +# partial messages; currently-theoretical attack
> +# unsurprisingly this hits 0/0 right now.  But should we promote it anyway
> +# to protect against the possibility?
> +header FRAGMENTED_MESSAGE    Content-Type =~ /\bmessage\/partial/i
> +describe FRAGMENTED_MESSAGE  Partial message
> +
>  header MISSING_HB_SEP                eval:check_for_missing_hb_separator()
>  describe MISSING_HB_SEP              Missing blank line between message 
> header and body
>  
> 
> Modified: spamassassin/trunk/rules/50_scores.cf
> Url:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/spamassassin/trunk/rules/50_scores.cf?view=diff&rev=106135&p1=spamassassin/trunk/rules/50_scores.cf&r1=106134&p2=spamassassin/trunk/rules/50_scores.cf&r2=106135
> ==============================================================================
> --- spamassassin/trunk/rules/50_scores.cf     (original)
> +++ spamassassin/trunk/rules/50_scores.cf     Sun Nov 21 14:49:14 2004
> @@ -619,10 +619,9 @@
>  # GTUBE - Generic Test for Unsolicited Bulk Email
>  score GTUBE 1000.000
>  
> -# long header test
> +# we dare you
>  score HEAD_LONG 2.5
> -
> -# missing blank line between header and body
> +score FRAGMENTED_MESSAGE 2.5
>  score MISSING_HB_SEP 2.5
>  
>  # HTML control test
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh CVS

iD8DBQFBoWTCMJF5cimLx9ARAh+3AJ9ecYONAcMjCwbioiqQM70kxBV4KwCgh4+A
TG2qxiUfpF1l0YAMunQ07xY=
=1OZx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to