[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason) writes: > btw, would a name prefix sound like a good idea for a convention to > indicate "rules that exist to catch never-seen-in-the-wild spammer > exploits"? Something like "EVIL" or similar?
*shrug* "EVIL" sounds good, but I don't care too much. We do see these a bit: 0.044 0.0537 0.0000 1.000 0.54 2.50 MISSING_HB_SEP 0.003 0.0030 0.0015 0.671 0.46 2.50 HEAD_LONG 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 0.500 0.46 0.01 T_FRAGMENTED_MESSAGE There are probably a few others that fall into this category. -- Daniel Quinlan http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/
