http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4290





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-04-29 13:28 -------
Well, in our case the same name server is used by both the slow and the
less slow machine (I can't call an Ultra 10 fast :-).  I first ran into the
problem when I was adapting the patch for Bug 4260 to SA 3.0.2 and noticed
that the dnsbl test failed about half the time.  I decided to see what the
current svn version did and found that it had the same failure but with a
80 to 90% failure rate.  That is, on about 10 to 20% of the times that I
ran make test, the test passes with no errors.  As the patch for Bug 4260
was then being changed, I decided to wait a few days and try the now current
svn.  Same problem. The unpatched SA 3.0.2 passes every time as does the
svn version when run on a faster machine (well, my patched 3.0.2 is also fine
on the faster machine).



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Reply via email to