http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4163
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-06 03:26 ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Subject: Re: RFE: add reporting support to spamd/spamc > > > > > I would like to start the spamc-part. But before I want to discuss the usage. > > I think it would make sense to make reporting and learning combineable, so only > > one time the message has to be transfered to spamd. But too I want to make it an > > single useable feature. > > Or should it be only configureable at the spamd site. So spamd would decide to > > report the message to razor...? So it could be user-dependet (sql > > database). > > Please feel free to get going on the spamc part, please note that I > had to backtrack on some of the spamc portions for learning to keep it > binary compatible, so please keep that that in mind. > > You'll want to support reporting and revoking, unfortunately -r is > already taken as an option (it is time to move to long options for > spamc?), so do your best to come up with something sane. > > No need to somehow combine the efforts, since reporting automatically > triggers a learn as spam and revoking automatically triggers a learn > as ham. > > Lets not overthink the user dependent stuff, and just implement the > same way as we did with learn, if someone wants to add the ability to > turn things off later then we'll add it then. > > I don't think the spamd portion will be too hard, but it might be a > bit too ambitious for 3.1, but we'll see. > > Michael > As I consider this again. I think it won't be a good idea to learn automatically if triggered for report/revoke. - report/revoke would produce some (network) overhead if done everytime a message is learned (especially no one remembers that report/revoke happens when learning is done) - no need for a seperate spamc switch (-L already implemented) I'am not amused not to overthink the user part. Please introduce to query the 'use_Razor2' (and other) settings from SQL/ userpref and use that for reporting!? I think it should be! Sorry, but I've another opinion about that :-) >We could go simple and do something like: >Reported: Yes >Reported: No I vote for that. +1 :-) >Did you pick out command line options? Not as you considered. I've simply add an switch (-W) to spamc! Too, there are some others free. Not perfectly but it works. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
