http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4505
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-30 21:48 -------
Subject: Re: Score generation for SpamAssassin 3.1
> BTW weren't we planning to set the BAYES_ scores non-mutable?
> can't quite recall.
I know there had been talk of it, although I'm too lazy to try to dig up the
thread.
I think, if it isn't too much work, what I'd like to see would be something
like taking the final generated scoreset, normalizing the bayes numbers for
all sets to ascending sequence more or less*, and then locking them and
rerunning the score generation to get updated values for the other rules.
* From the data I looked at in Henry's posting, I seem to recall that 05
and 99 were obviously out of sequence. I think 99 is the critical one to
have in sequence. 05 may be correct where it is, even though out of
sequence. Perhaps a topic for discussion.
Loren
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
