http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=3808
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-03 16:13 ------- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > What would be the gain of doing that in the parent? The only difference I > > see > > is added complexity. > It would let the children focus solely on being processing engines and let the > parent worry about the rest of the details (scheduling, logging, etc). [ funny comment about processes which needed to focus more because they kept forgetting what to do next removed ;-) ] > Also, as mentioned earlier, see some of other related tickets which would > require something like this anyway (bug 4911, bug 5025, etc.) I don't know > how 5025 can be solved by parsing log files; no need for IPC. 4911 -- crontab is teh tool. > much complexity would be added since we already have the code to allow parents > and children to talk via a back channel. Now: create a string, write it to file handle. After: create a string, write it to socket, read from socket, write to file handle. Looks more complex to me... ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
