http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5110
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|Undefined |3.2.0
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-27 15:09 -------
9.916 11.8320 0.5927 0.952 0.69 0.85 EXTRA_MPART_TYPE
So FWIW, both ham and spam hit on this, and it's basically always
multipart/related, so trying to avoid hitting on that type essentially means to
kill the rule. Perhaps there's a way to clean up the ham hits by looking at
both the type and the type="??" value. In general, I think this is just one of
those things that can definitely happen in ham but seems to be a lot more
prevalent in spam. The scores are relatively low though IMO, and they'd be
lower if representative mails were included in the next score generation run:
score EXTRA_MPART_TYPE 0.847 0.815 0.733 1.091
BTW: I'm also not sure why the multipart bit is in the RE:
Content-Type =~ /(?:\s*multipart\/)?.* type=/i
Seems strange.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
