Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 01:16:14PM +0200, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote: >> 1) Indirect SMTP submission to spamcop. >> Should the plug-in allow "indirect" submissions via SMTP? >> Goals: throughput averaging, overcoming network problems > > I'm not sure what this means.
On my *personal* installation about 5% of reports may hit "temporary network problems". I have modified the plugin to send via local MTA to avoid any "loss of reports". >> 2) Post spamcop submission auto-ack >> Should SpamAssassin provide a tool for automatic acknowledgements of >> spam submitted to SpamCop.net via SMTP? [it requires WWW confirmation] > > Hell no. I thought about *separate* program (perl script) for the task. Spamcop sends LARTs to responsible net-masters/web-masters only for acknowledged spam. "Manual acknowledgment" of 50+ spam per day (day after day) is unlikely. >> 3) Generalizing the spamcop plug-in >> Should the plug-in be made "more general" to allow submitting spam >> samples to other willing "spam sinks"? > > FWIW, I'd rather see a new more generic SMTPReporter (or whatever) > plugin, and then the SC one would be deprecated. OK if you prefere to put it this way. -- [pl2en: Andrew] Andrzej Adam Filip : [EMAIL PROTECTED] : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
