Justin Mason wrote: > Michael Parker writes: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> Author: jm >>> Date: Wed May 2 04:59:05 2007 >>> New Revision: 534404 >>> >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=534404 >>> Log: >>> Creating the new 3.2.0 maintainance branch >>> >>> Added: >>> spamassassin/branches/b3_2_0/ >>> - copied from r534402, spamassassin/tags/spamassassin_release_3_2_0/ >>> >> Any particular reason you went with b3_2_0 instead of 3.2 like we did >> for 3.0 and 3.1? > > build/README used the "b3_x_0" format. if "3.2" was more appropriate, we > should have updated the procedure docs... :( >
Hmm that doesn't make it right, I think breaking from what was already established is a bad idea. I'd vote for going ahead and recreating the branch in the right place and removing this. I'd be happy to update any README files that are misguided. Michael
