Justin Mason wrote: > Michael Parker writes: >>> build/README used the "b3_x_0" format. if "3.2" was more appropriate, we >>> should have updated the procedure docs... :( >>> >> Hmm that doesn't make it right, I think breaking from what was already >> established is a bad idea. I'd vote for going ahead and recreating the >> branch in the right place and removing this. >> I'd be happy to update any README files that are misguided. > > ok, I think I've fixed it in most places -- feel free to take a look > for others... >
Awesome, thanks. Michael
