http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5830





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-16 19:50 -------
(In reply to comment #0)
> Ijust went through some months spam corpus, and it seems about 99.99% of this
> particular broken Message-Id does hit the X-Mailer rule, too. Hence the meta
> rule -- it probably wouldn't be necessary, though.

Hrm.  Checked on the remaining ~0.01%, which actually are exactly 3 messages
from Oct last year. I don't get it, the X-Mailer headers are perfect MS Outlook
forged examples. Even the meta rule should have hit here, too.

grep shows 'em just fine. SA seems to not see these X-Mailer headers at all.
Even $status->get('X-Mailer') fails to return it.  Weird.




------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Reply via email to