http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5830
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-20 12:12 ------- Thanks for the rather exhaustive explanation, Justin. :) (In reply to comment #7) > well, I'd like to get them checked in for further testing in our Rule-QA > system: http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/ > Committed revision 629394. > here's what I checked in: I'm comfortable with SVN, and finally got an uptodate trunk checkout again. > note the minor changes; renames to include the KB prefix and use of (?:...) > instead of (...) for efficiency. Cool. However, seriously, instead of the custom __KB_OUTLOOK_MUA rule, bug 5774 should be fixed. It's simply adding the optional Office part. It's probably just fine for testing, though. Also, I kind of fell in love with the name Theo used for the rule. KB_RATWARE_MSGID just sounds awesome. :) > - wait a day or two and see how they perform in results on > http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/ > > - if they're good, do some further discussion about: wiping out remaining > false > positives (or dangers of same); ways to improve the hitrates slightly; ways to > reduce redundant overlap with existing rules; ways to trim down the number of > versions of the proposed new rules. Time to wait a day... ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
