https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6251
Matthias Leisi <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #4 from Matthias Leisi <[email protected]> 2009-12-09 04:58:09 UTC --- > http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20091205-r887515-n > Weekly masscheck for many weeks have been showing a minor but consistent > amount > of false positives in DNSWL medium and low. As a matter of practice I Are these actual false positives or due to trusted_networks etc. errors? > My concerns: > * DNSWL has no obvious and easy methods on their site to report violations > where spam was sent from a DNSWL listed host. There is a feedback form and an email address. > * Does DNSWL currently use spam traps as an automated method to detect > whitelist violations? I don't know. Whatever their regular practices are, I > strongly believe that automation is the only sustainable way for a service of > nature to be maintainable in the long-term. dnswl.org is mostly based on manual processes (there are regular crosschecks with blacklists, extensive use of DNS logs etc and additional tools). (Full Disclosure: I'm the dnswl.org project leader) -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
