https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6251
Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #6 from Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]> 2009-12-09 07:05:07 UTC --- > dnswl.org is mostly based on manual processes (there are regular crosschecks > with blacklists, extensive use of DNS logs etc and additional tools). > > (Full Disclosure: I'm the dnswl.org project leader) I don't have a problem with manual processes for the record. I also don't necessarily believe our rules have to be based on any criteria such as email response, etc. This is because I agree completely with Justin that SA's entire framework is designed to deal with FPs/FNs by weighted scoring. Lowering the scores and running tests would be the appropriate action from my perspective. Additionally, the scores suggested seem good. Therefore, I am +1 on changing the DNSWL scores to: score RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW 0 -0.7 0 -0.7 score RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED 0 -2.3 0 -2.3 score RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI 0 -5 0 -5 KAM -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
