https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6390
AXB <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #1 from AXB <[email protected]> 2010-03-26 15:48:48 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > 72_scores.cf:score KHOP_SC_CIDR16 2.200 1.291 2.200 > 1.291 > 72_scores.cf:score KHOP_SC_CIDR24 2.649 1.198 2.649 > 1.198 > 72_scores.cf:score KHOP_SC_TOP200 4.000 3.944 4.000 > 3.944 > 72_scores.cf:score KHOP_SC_TOP_CIDR16 2.797 0.728 2.797 > 0.728 > 72_scores.cf:score KHOP_SC_TOP_CIDR24 0.001 0.000 0.001 > 0.000 > 72_scores.cf:score KHOP_SC_TOP_CIDR8 2.200 0.001 2.200 > 0.001 > > it looks like all the other SC rules (scores) take into account 'net', so that > if you have the ip already in spamcop (you have to be in spam cop to be in sc > anyway), the other rules seem to take that into account. > > however, if (again, if you are in top200, you ARE in spamcop), so with rbls's > enabled, and net enabled, anything that is in sc_200 will score 5.3 points: > 4 points for being in sc_top200, 1.3 points for being in spamcop itself. > > this will put it over the top for (99%?) of all SA installations. > > suggest manual tweaks on score for 'net' scores, lower by the spamcop bl > score. IMO, depending on the kind of traffic you have, its safest to disable these rules completely. (worked for me) -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
