https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6545
--- Comment #16 from Warren Togami <[email protected]> 2011-03-28 10:12:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > Matthias? I haven't seen a response on the DNSWL list in the last three > days. > How do you feel about accepting abuse reports from people who haven't created > an account, as a condition of including this plugin in SA? Are you sure the DNSWL infrastructure can handle this many reports? Perhaps we should obtain a submission rate from one of the existing receivers of spamassassin -r reports? Would that be Spamcop? Would DNSWL desire to receive reports on *ALL* spamassassin -r or only if DNSWL_* rules were hit? > > I can just create a DNSWL abuse reporter account specifically for it, and we > can reduce the weight of its reports or something. I might strongly advise against a catch-all account for this. Doing so would make it extra difficult to separate the good and bad reporters. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
