While I really appreciate you trying to keep bugzilla clean (yes, really
really :), this probably would have belonged to bugzilla...
On Sat, 2011-03-19 at 22:49 -0400, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
> > Thanks, Darxus. However... That was not a request for the ability to report.
> > That was a complaint about DNSWL hits downscoring spam, "just below the
> > threshold".
>
> He wasn't one of the people I was referring to requesting abuse reporting
> ability.
Then WHY was that the one and only mentioning and link of requests? In
your own words, "There were requests for ability to report abuse to
DNSWL here", with that one link.
> > None of his sample headers provided scored below 6.0, still classified spam
> > by
> > stock SA. He did not provide evidence (other than to you and Matthias
> > privately), and even mentioned inappropriate trusted and internal settings
> > for
> > forwarders could have been causing this. There is no final conclusion on the
> > list. [1]
>
> The stuff he emailed us matched what he said on the list, that he was
> getting stuff relayed from trusted servers (iki.fi) without listing them in
> trusted_networks.
Thanks for the samples to private@.
So, the actual issue was a (known) forwarding relay, missing in trusted
networks? And in the end (which never has been posted to the thread on
the users list), this was a mis-configuration?
Thus, any reporting to DNSWL even would have been counter-productive,
actually accusing (and possibly downgrading) a host, that is listed in
DNSWL MED for a reason.
No?
As you highlight in bold on your own site hosting the plugin currently,
having the internal and trusted networks correct is important. Even more
important for reporting. I guess this just stresses this point.
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
