https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6577
[email protected] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |software+spamassassin@kd6lv | |w.ampr.org --- Comment #5 from [email protected] 2011-04-26 03:41:18 EDT --- This ("::/80" - to accomodate both original forms "::/96" and "::FFFF:0:0/80") and 2002::/16 both have known IPv4 mappings. A fix to extract the appropriate bits for an IPv4 address to check would require a programming fix, assuming that it's not already handled. Scanning the text format of the address would not be efficient. Comparing the converted 128-bit address would be better. I also note that the sample "Received:" header does not follow the required RFC 5321 ABNF syntax and is thus invalid. [The "id" clause is in the wrong place. It should be before the datestamp.] -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
