On 05/24, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > I consider 3.2 unmaintained and people should be running 3.3.X. I > consider a valid cross-over period to maintain both releases but > 3.2.x has long since dropped off my radar.
3.3.x has only been available since 2010-01-27. Dropping support for mission critical software after only providing 4 months to do a major upgrade is bullshit. Dropping support without even mentioning it on the website is similarly poor. Compare Ubuntu's 5 years of support for LTS releases on servers. On 05/24, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > I think that's a bit harsh as we don't claim to maintain ANY version > and haven't had a release in very nearly 3 years in the 3.2 branch. It should be sufficiently implied that we support the software we provide. And the nearly 3 years since the last 3.2 release is not the relevant time period. The 4 months since it was released is. -- "The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability of the human mind to correlate all its contents." http://www.ChaosReigns.com
