https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6648
--- Comment #12 from Darxus <[email protected]> 2011-08-12 16:12:20 UTC --- What percentage of legit emails were passing SPF and DKIM when rules for them were added? (In reply to comment #9) > I'm sorry but this was beaten to death long time ago on the users list. But as > long as it never will be on by default I don't care either way. It's > ridiculous > to assume people would adopt this just because SA uses it. Why is it ridiculous to assume people would adopt this just because SA uses it? That's not quite exactly what I'm suggesting. What's wrong with adding it to SA to see if it increases adoption and ends up very useful? (In reply to comment #11) > Plugins don't get added coz we like them or they've been written by friends. > They get added because they prove themselves efficient and do something worth > while. And what if the best chance something has to prove itself efficient and worth while is to add it to SA? > First, it should be added to > http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CustomPlugins and allow potential users to > test and comment. Done. > It can be also placed in a samnbox and allow masschecks to use it and if the > results are convincing , it will be reviewed, discusses, tested, taken apart > and maybe it gets added to mainstream code. So I should create a patch to create a rulesrc/sandbox/darxus directory in trunk containing MTX.pm, a .pre to load the module and a .cf to set the scores? -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
